01-22-2016, 11:42 AM
Your "if it's on the internet, it must be true!" bit doesn't apply here, F.U.
What I posted isn't an internet blog opinion or unsourced internet claim. The results of the investigation are contained in official documents, summaries of which are available on the internet, in public broadcasts, in books...
The investigation did not bode favorably for the government in terms of how the conflict started and how it was (mis)managed. But, the government absolutely did not storm in and kill the Davidians with a rat-a-tat-tat -- that's not debatable. And, while I believe and accept the arson investigators' conclusions, it doesn't concern or bother me that you don't.
What I posted isn't an internet blog opinion or unsourced internet claim. The results of the investigation are contained in official documents, summaries of which are available on the internet, in public broadcasts, in books...
The investigation did not bode favorably for the government in terms of how the conflict started and how it was (mis)managed. But, the government absolutely did not storm in and kill the Davidians with a rat-a-tat-tat -- that's not debatable. And, while I believe and accept the arson investigators' conclusions, it doesn't concern or bother me that you don't.