03-21-2016, 12:58 AM
Is Richard Sherman just being a disrespectful asshole, or does he make a good point?
I don't know the answer and I like Sherman even if he is being an asshole, but I'm curious what people who follow NFL closely think about his comments today.
![[Image: 050814-sports-richard-sherman-roger-goodell.jpg]](http://www.bet.com/news/sports/2014/05/08/richard-sherman-says-nfl-wouldn-t-have-banned-sterling-for-life/_jcr_content/featuredMedia/newsitemimage.newsimage.dimg/050814-sports-richard-sherman-roger-goodell.jpg)
In regards to Roger Goodell's proposal that players be ejected if they commit two personal fouls in a game, Sherman (now a member of the Players Association Executive Committee) told ESPN: "'I think it's foolish, but it sounds like something somebody who's never played the game would say, something that they would suggest, because he doesn't understand. He's just a face. He's just a suit. He's never stepped foot on the field and understood how you can get a personal foul."
(The fouls that would count toward an ejection would be kicking; throwing a punch, a forearm; using threatening, abusive or insulting language; and using taunting or baiting acts.)
Sherman was also asked why the rules governing what a catch is have caused so much controversy. Sherman told ESPN:"Because you've got a bunch of suits doing it. Like I said before, you don't have a bunch of guys ... let Jerry Rice and Michael Irvin talk about it for about 20, 30 minutes. Maybe Cris Carter. Randy Moss, let those guys have a roundtable discussion about what a catch should be and come up with a rule. I guarantee you it'd be more effective than the rule they have now because those are the pass-catchers. 'Those are some of the best pass-catchers we've had. I think it'd be more straightforward and to the point."
The league's competition committee will present 19 rule change proposals at the NFL owner's meeting this week in Boca Raton, Florida.
I don't know the answer and I like Sherman even if he is being an asshole, but I'm curious what people who follow NFL closely think about his comments today.
![[Image: 050814-sports-richard-sherman-roger-goodell.jpg]](http://www.bet.com/news/sports/2014/05/08/richard-sherman-says-nfl-wouldn-t-have-banned-sterling-for-life/_jcr_content/featuredMedia/newsitemimage.newsimage.dimg/050814-sports-richard-sherman-roger-goodell.jpg)
In regards to Roger Goodell's proposal that players be ejected if they commit two personal fouls in a game, Sherman (now a member of the Players Association Executive Committee) told ESPN: "'I think it's foolish, but it sounds like something somebody who's never played the game would say, something that they would suggest, because he doesn't understand. He's just a face. He's just a suit. He's never stepped foot on the field and understood how you can get a personal foul."
(The fouls that would count toward an ejection would be kicking; throwing a punch, a forearm; using threatening, abusive or insulting language; and using taunting or baiting acts.)
Sherman was also asked why the rules governing what a catch is have caused so much controversy. Sherman told ESPN:"Because you've got a bunch of suits doing it. Like I said before, you don't have a bunch of guys ... let Jerry Rice and Michael Irvin talk about it for about 20, 30 minutes. Maybe Cris Carter. Randy Moss, let those guys have a roundtable discussion about what a catch should be and come up with a rule. I guarantee you it'd be more effective than the rule they have now because those are the pass-catchers. 'Those are some of the best pass-catchers we've had. I think it'd be more straightforward and to the point."
The league's competition committee will present 19 rule change proposals at the NFL owner's meeting this week in Boca Raton, Florida.