Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY
#46
(11-02-2016, 03:01 PM)Carsman Wrote:
(11-02-2016, 10:28 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:
(11-02-2016, 08:56 AM)Carsman Wrote:
(11-02-2016, 04:34 AM)Duchess Wrote:
(11-02-2016, 03:31 AM)Carsman Wrote: Her stepping stone started way back when she swallowed her pride and let the Monica scandal slide


What do mean by "let the Monica scandal slide"?


She accepted the horrendous humiliation of his debauchery!

She didn't kick him to the curb, as most, if not all women (probably not you) would have done! He was her politics ticket into the future!

Obviously not "all" women would have kicked him to the curb, Cars. Lots of men and women, especially those with children, stay with their cheating spouses for various reasons.

Hillary Clinton's handling of the situation helped save her husband's campaign, his political career, and her marriage. Her favorable ratings were sky high after that scandal, though I don't know if they would be in today's climate under the same circumstances.

Anyway, Hillary Clinton got elected Senator (twice) and appointed Secretary of State on her own merit. I don't think the fact that she stayed with her husband after he received inappropriate but consensual blow jobs had anything to do with it. If standing by your cheating man is all it took to pave a political career, Mrs. Trump, Mrs. Guiliani, Mrs. Gingrich and many many more wives of politicians might be in the running for the highest office in the land.

Re read my post again, it says "most", if not all, and I already mentioned that Duch would not have kicked him to the curb.

Hillary wanted to keep/carry the Svengali cherished "Clinton name" into politics. She was right, it did open many doors for her!

hah

I read you right the first time, Cars. EVEN WITHOUT THE COLORED TEXT EMPHASIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I guess you didn't really mean what you posted. You could have stopped your speculation at 'most women', but chose to expand it to "if not all (but Duchess)". That latter part is definitely false hyperbole, which is what I addressed.

And, the rest of what you're insisting to be true about Hillary Clinton in this instance is just your dramatic opinion and pretty funny to me. So, carry on (no need to bust out your bully stick on my ass again!).
Reply


Messages In This Thread
THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-12-2016, 05:22 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 09-12-2016, 10:17 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Donovan - 09-12-2016, 11:20 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-12-2016, 12:42 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by cannongal - 09-13-2016, 05:33 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Maggot - 09-12-2016, 12:44 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-12-2016, 12:57 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Midwest Spy - 09-12-2016, 01:16 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-12-2016, 01:20 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Midwest Spy - 09-12-2016, 01:28 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-12-2016, 01:31 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-13-2016, 05:39 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by cannongal - 09-13-2016, 06:05 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-13-2016, 06:07 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by cannongal - 09-13-2016, 06:15 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 09-13-2016, 06:57 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by cannongal - 09-13-2016, 07:04 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Maggot - 09-13-2016, 06:26 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 10-31-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 10-31-2016, 05:53 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Clang McFly - 10-31-2016, 08:03 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Maggot - 10-31-2016, 08:31 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Donovan - 11-01-2016, 11:09 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-01-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Maggot - 11-01-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Donovan - 11-01-2016, 10:53 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-01-2016, 11:36 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 03:31 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 11-02-2016, 04:34 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 08:56 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-02-2016, 10:38 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 03:01 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by HairOfTheDog - 11-02-2016, 03:33 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 03:47 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Duchess - 11-02-2016, 12:56 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 03:05 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-02-2016, 08:53 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Midwest Spy - 11-02-2016, 09:46 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 09:46 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-02-2016, 11:15 AM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-02-2016, 12:34 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by BlueTiki - 11-02-2016, 12:56 PM
RE: THE MORON'S CASE FOR HILLARY - by Carsman - 11-02-2016, 04:03 PM