11-04-2016, 08:09 PM
I think the Prosecution proved the charge related to sexual communications with a minor and made a fairly compelling circumstantial case for malice murder.
But, I'm not sure the case was strong enough to exceed reasonable doubt. Some of the evidence presented at the Probable Cause hearing over two years ago was overstated, in my opinion.
Anyone have a strong opinion as to whether Harris will be convicted of malice murder (requires intent to kill), or felony cruelty to children (requires intent to harm), or aquitted?
But, I'm not sure the case was strong enough to exceed reasonable doubt. Some of the evidence presented at the Probable Cause hearing over two years ago was overstated, in my opinion.
Anyone have a strong opinion as to whether Harris will be convicted of malice murder (requires intent to kill), or felony cruelty to children (requires intent to harm), or aquitted?