12-16-2016, 01:56 AM
Roof was read his Miranda rights and knew full well anything he said can and would be used against him in a court of law.
And, he received due process and a fair trial with a jury of his peers.
There is no constitutional issue with showing interrogation and confession tapes at trial, Biggie, and sequestering the jury is rarely done and is also not a constitutional matter.
So, what the heck are you talking about? Did you just read that comment somewhere and figure it sounded good, or do you really think there was some constitutional issue that doesn't seem fair? If the latter, explain a bit so we can consider your beef.
And, he received due process and a fair trial with a jury of his peers.
There is no constitutional issue with showing interrogation and confession tapes at trial, Biggie, and sequestering the jury is rarely done and is also not a constitutional matter.
So, what the heck are you talking about? Did you just read that comment somewhere and figure it sounded good, or do you really think there was some constitutional issue that doesn't seem fair? If the latter, explain a bit so we can consider your beef.