03-16-2018, 04:36 PM
(03-16-2018, 03:43 PM)F.U. Wrote: Yes but if you read just above what you quoted, you will see this.
“The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them.”
Full possession. Not some. Not most. Full possession of their weapons. The feds were to keep their hands off entirely.
That portion is currently not happening. While we can currently own fully automatic firearms and sound suppressors etc they are heavily taxed. Now there is talk of banning other types of firearms. That goes directly against the quote I mentioned.
FU, I don't want anyone to have to lose their right to weapons that they may use to defend themselves or their families, nor do I want to take anyone's weapon who may use it to provide for themselves, as in hunting. I don't like citizens having weapons of war, I don't like them having guns that are used specifically for killing people. Why would anyone need to have access to weapons with their only purpose being to kill humans?