This would be funner if . . . . . .

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

This would be funner if . . . . . .

HairOfTheDog Offline

Offline

Moderator

Posts: 29,189
Threads: 391
Joined: Aug 2011

#21

10-21-2018, 08:45 AM

(10-21-2018, 05:35 AM)Duchess Wrote:
(10-20-2018, 10:20 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Scrunchies

WellWellWell, missy. The only reason I'm not getting on your case is because of my respect for both you and RBG who also wears them. Any other person would be feeling the wrath of my tongue.

Hey, don't try to shame me. I'm wearing an ugly old 1980s-looking scrunchy right this minute and proud of it! ')

I always use a scrunchy to put my hair in a ponytail when I exercise or walk early in the mornings.

But I don't wear wear ponytails any other time.

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-20-2018, 07:58 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-20-2018, 09:09 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-20-2018, 09:13 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-20-2018, 09:23 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by sally - 10-20-2018, 10:11 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Rootilda - 10-20-2018, 09:28 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Fry Guy - 10-20-2018, 09:33 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Rootilda - 10-20-2018, 09:59 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:12 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:17 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by sally - 10-20-2018, 10:18 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:20 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Duchess - 10-21-2018, 05:35 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by sally - 10-20-2018, 10:24 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:45 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:31 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:34 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-20-2018, 10:35 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-20-2018, 10:47 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-20-2018, 11:18 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-21-2018, 08:45 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-21-2018, 08:59 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Maggot - 10-21-2018, 10:57 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Duchess - 10-21-2018, 11:54 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by sally - 10-21-2018, 09:37 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Blindgreed1 - 10-24-2018, 06:59 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-24-2018, 08:08 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by sally - 10-24-2018, 09:13 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-24-2018, 11:33 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-24-2018, 07:02 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-24-2018, 08:30 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-25-2018, 01:36 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by HairOfTheDog - 10-25-2018, 02:54 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-26-2018, 06:37 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-27-2018, 10:42 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Love Child - 10-26-2018, 11:22 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-27-2018, 11:57 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-27-2018, 05:17 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Duchess - 10-27-2018, 12:08 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-27-2018, 02:56 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-27-2018, 03:12 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-27-2018, 11:21 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-28-2018, 09:39 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-28-2018, 09:44 AM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-28-2018, 06:42 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 10-28-2018, 07:22 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-29-2018, 03:26 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Maggot - 10-29-2018, 04:06 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 10-29-2018, 04:33 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by BigMark - 10-29-2018, 04:33 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by sally - 10-29-2018, 08:56 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 11-04-2018, 07:33 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Carsman - 11-05-2018, 04:41 PM

RE: This would be funner if . . . . . . - by Clang McFly - 11-05-2018, 05:45 PM

View a Printable Version