Hang in there Mock

[Borndragon]

[user=7]Sinister[/user] wrote:

This idea was brought up and considered in the recent past, and shot down by me ... but I will look at it and consider it again.

What is different now that would make you consider this really ridiculous idea?

Text book Sinislag self-serving bullshit right there, with her trying to shot down a system that's been proven to work on real flame forums, that happen to be a thousand times more hardcore than Mock and they don't view it as a sign of weakness or going soft. It's a required tool that is a must if you want the site to get away from the grade school playground bullshit.
Funny how Sinisters oh so 'brilliant and original' idea of a single
thread based on the same theory of not having members flame one another was deemed, by her dullard ass, as a great idea, which members, she wept, couldn't grasp, as she threw it out there and demanded members follow her fly by the seat of her pants rules, which only ended up with her having a hissy, deleting posts and locking the thread.

[user=7]Sinister[/user] Blurted:

note; if anyone posts something about how annoying or stupid or retarded another member here in Mock is, I will simply delete that post without warning. Using this as a rant to shit on other members negates the purpose for this thread.

So that ^^^^ was a masterpiece of an idea, since you proposed it, right Sinister, but MF actually implementing an entire, proven and much needed section based on the same hypothesis, just better thought out and not flash in the pan, self-serving, PMS based bullshit, is a "really ridiculous idea?"
Is that your statement, Sinister?

You're such a fidgety, changeling and obvious hypocrite, Sinister.

But don't worry, Frank's bitch ass is too chicken shit to do anything about it.






Borndragon ~ and that's what you're counting on.