07-20-2009, 02:10 PM
Ordinary Peephole Wrote:What? Not in proportion. A chihuahua for instance has far less meat than any chicken. Chickens are bred to provide high yields of food. Farmers habitually only breed chickens which contain the most meat, the skinny chickens are effectively removed from the genetic pool.Mock2zuma Wrote:2) There is not substantial meat on these particular animals, it's a waste to even consider them a food source.Theres more meat on a dog than there is on a chicken.
Dogs, on the other hand, are bred for specific, physical characteristics and behaviour and have been for many many centuries.
I've met 8 year olds that can grasp this concept of collectivistic breeding. I trust you have the capacity to do the same.
Ordinary Peephole wrote:
Quote:Antbitch in a survival situation would rather eat the flesh of a fellow human than a horse, 100% true.
This is because she is retarded and has the moral compass of a 4th century blood drinking pagan barbarian.
HA! You brits have a history of consuming the placenta after a woman has given birth. Even though there is more meaning behind it, the fact still stands. That IS human placenta; which makes many of you CANNIBALS!
Hypocrasy: It's a bitch! ::banana::