12-07-2009, 11:38 PM
(12-07-2009, 09:32 AM)IMaDick Wrote:(12-06-2009, 09:24 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: Regardless of the retard dictionary you found your info from, killing inhumanely is the issue.
No one rejected the food chain. We just think that you're a cold cunt who thinks killing and suffering mean nothing if it's not you or yours.
Ya I know definitions can be killers especially when it comes to intelligent conversation they really fuck up the touchy feely application of facts.
"we just think" should have been a clue that you are expressing opinion not fact, but hey if thats where you think the world is centered in "your opinion" then what else could be expected.
I just find it ::rotf::::rotf::::rotf::::rotf:: funny as hell !
Hey! I have a great idea. Why don't you re-quote and respond to the same post multiple times? That way, you look like an even bigger idiot, like some kid who keeps trying to come up with better 'comebacks' to some insult earlier in the day.
The 'fact' is, most dictionaries DO define humans as animals. That particular one doesn't. Do you honestly think that quoting a definition which contradicts MOST definitions, as well as the insurmountable fact that science DOES consider humans to be animals, makes your argument valid?
THAT is 'funny as hell'. Well, not really. It's actually pretty boring, but it seemed like a good spot to use that.