11-20-2021, 01:06 PM
(11-20-2021, 12:21 PM)Duchess Wrote:(11-20-2021, 12:10 PM)rothschild Wrote:(11-20-2021, 05:17 AM)Duchess Wrote:(11-19-2021, 10:26 PM)sally Wrote:(11-05-2021, 10:27 AM)Duchess Wrote: Without a doubt, you are one of the most revolting people that I've ever had the misfortune of "meeting", and that's sayin' something given what a hellscape the internet is.
I've not paid much attention to this case, but I just read that one of the guys he killed was a convicted sex offender with 11 counts of rape on children from age 5 to 11. Is this true? It seems all of the people he shot were scum of the earth. Since you're defending them you may not have any business calling others revolting.
Says the person who thinks Hitler was on to something.
I don't think I've ever looked up the background on those who have been killed to see if their murders have been justified.
If you think the media is a better judge of guilt/innocence than the judiciary, why do you bother pretending to care about democracy?
Why do you think my opinion is that the media is a better judge of guilt/innocent?
Because murder is a crime, whereas the verdict is that there was no crime committed by the defendant: but more importantly, the court proceedings demonstrated very clearly that the prosecutors were dishonest and malicious, which we saw from Grosskreutz's testimony, who acknowledged that he provoked Rittenhouse, and that he was concerned for his safety because he was being assaulted. They expected him to lie, but he couldn't do that when he was presented with photographic evidence of his actions. There are a great many other examples of prosecutorial malice and deception, as well.