07-22-2023, 01:52 PM
(07-21-2023, 02:16 AM)BlueTiki Wrote: Yes, RC. Too many moving parts. It is not a sociological perspective, it's a fact. ("Fuck you" was my initial response.)
Who, what, why, when . . . you give partial snippets (of which I mostly agree) of what is in the works and yet, ignore any solid or cohesive theory of how these events will come together and why the masses will rally behind this new Global World Order.
This grand scheme of Global World Order . . . you also pay no credence to effective rebellion, by those to be subjugated, and the Cabal's method to defeat any push-back from them.
And yet, that information is published and widely available . . . from the Cabal, itself.
No offense, I'm well aware of all of the "players" and theories you have posted. And . . . I agree with much of what you post (including most of your conclusions, premises and analysis).
However, your complete rejection of the essential components of fear and tribalism (of the populous), for the Globalists to achieve their goal, is your blind spot.
And that is what the Globalists will exploit . . . it's the magic trick, performed right in front of you . . . and you're too blinded by "facts" and "players" and "theories" to see.
How is "the populous" -- which is rife with divisions -- of serious consequence when they're dependant on corporations for their survival -- which is, and will continue to be, leveraged for maximum coercion?
If "too many moving parts" is indeed a fact, perhaps you could quantify it and provide a brief explanation of why they're an insurmountable obstacle.
The only major obstacle I see is the obedience of subordinates in the globalist hierarchy, hence the need for characterizing it's behavior as "emergency management". They're subject to coercion, reprisal, and if necessary, replacement.
Is that an insurmountable obstacle? Perhaps, but it certainly wasn't in the case of Nazi Germany. The scale is different here, but functionaries tend to be servile, and mangers who climb the ladder tend to be brown nosers, neither of which tend to have an abundance of moral fiber.