11-04-2024, 02:25 AM
(11-04-2024, 12:53 AM)username Wrote:(11-04-2024, 12:27 AM)rothschild Wrote:(11-03-2024, 11:47 PM)username Wrote:(11-03-2024, 10:49 PM)sally Wrote: I'm glad you read 4 articles on fluoride and finally started educating yourself on the subject after 62 years, User. What Trump said was that it sounds okay to him, but he hasn't talked to RFK about it yet although it could be a possibility.
Like injecting bleach. This is the guy he’s saying he’s going to put in charge of health in some position in his administration.
Not surprised you’ve done and know nothing about the topic but like to bitch because no one’s handing you answers on a silver platter.
Trump’s “off the cuff” remarks aren’t cute or endearing or normal. I want a thoughtful POTUS that actually vets and researches this stuff before commenting or endorsing an idea first. Call me crazy.
Yeah, the Democratic Party is definitely the gold standard when it comes to thoughtfulness. I mean, what could possibly be more thoughtful than allowing biological men into women's spaces, right? Or using Ukraine as a staging ground to attack Russia. Boy has that worked out well for Ukraine, let me tell you. Some amazing thoughtfulness right there, User. Absolutely amazing.
WTF? Are u high? What do u mean about “biological men in women’s places”? I’m fine with gender neutral bathrooms; as long as I don’t have to share a private one with ANYONE else. Are u talking about sports? Cuz the IOC allowed that in 2004 and Bush was president at the time. Clarify.
And the democrats used Ukraine to attack Russia? After they (and Trump) let Russia have Crimea?
Cuz we’re just nice that way?
SMH. Just shut up. Ur credibility just went to minus zero.
You have no credibility when it comes to assessing credibility.
*Men* in women's prisons, *men* in women's restrooms, *men* in women's locker rooms. Conflating gender identity with biological sex, the end result of which is mass confusion and the bastardization of language and science. How about "gender affirmative healthcare"? How sick do you have to be to consider that thoughtful?
As for Russia, they made it crystal clear that NATO would not be tolerated in Ukraine, LONG before the invasion, and rightly so. You'd have to be an idiot to allow that to happen given that NATO refused to allow entry to the Russian Federation. It's a hostile entity that began to militarize Ukraine, which bears historical similarity to the Nazi remilitarization of the Rhineland. Unlike the French, who turned tail and ran home to build the Maginot Line, Russia stood it's ground and stopped NATO in it's tracks.
It's ironic because the West steadfastly claimed that NATO was the only thing that could defend Ukraine against Russia, and all it's managed to do is cause it's destruction. NATO has lost, Ukraine is largely uninhabitable, and Washington is left to claiming that there are North Korean soldiers trying to prevent the Russian front from collapsing. It's pathetic. Hundreds of billions of dollars have disappeared into the ether while the US economy has disintegrated. Because we were "defending democracy". Just like Bush and Cheney were bringing "democracy" to Iraq.
I feel bad for you because you don't have the excuse of being a drug addict. You're a typical, middle class American with the profundity of a mud puddle, convinced that you are knowledgeable when it comes to worldly matters -- and you are about to get a very rude awakening.