02-06-2010, 02:54 PM
(02-06-2010, 02:49 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: Looks like the good old U S of A have a great recent track record in Africa as well Burrito brain.
The U.S. military made its first direct intervention in Africa in 1992 amid Somalia's civil war as part of a UN peacekeeping mission. Washington's stated aim was ending a famine--but U.S. forces killed an estimated 10,000 until resistance forced the U.S. to withdraw in 1993.
During the genocide in Rwanda the following year, President Bill Clinton didn't lift a finger to stop one million murders in two months carried out by an ethnically based Hutu government against the minority Tutsis. In the aftermath of that bloodletting, a new Tutsi-led government took power in Rwanda. The new Rwandan government soon invaded eastern Congo--backed Kabila's rebel army--to establish a buffer between the Hutu refugees and Rwanda proper.
you still don't get it do you OP, No one went against the UK and their support of the genocide that they were financing.
we would be at war with your weak assed country again you would lose again and to what end?
but I do agree clinton had no balls.
try as you may you can't win this arguement, that is but one of a laundry list of shit the UK has been doing.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
John Adams