JOGGING WHILE BLACK

[rothschild]

Without going through the exact wording there’s the “reasonable person” expectation:

“All members of the community owe a duty to act as a reasonable person in undertaking or avoiding actions with the risk to harm others”.

Georgia has changed its citizen arrest law but there will always be assholes who act unreasonably and then look for the loopholes in the laws. Glad they didn’t skate.

Someone who doesn't bend over backwards for criminals is an "asshole"? Really?

Your homey was on parole when he was trespassing, and was shot as he attempted to grab McMichael's firearm.

If you were consistent you'd be working to legalize trespassing, because it's "harmless", right?

Stop making shit up. I said “assholes who act unreasonably”. I’m pretty sure the confederate flag carrying pricks who chased him were assholes to begin with (nobody I’d want to hang with) but their unreasonable actions are what landed them in jail. 
After chasing him for so many minutes they basically cut him off and cornered him. Why wouldn’t he try to grab the firearm? Did he not have the right to defend himself? Hmmm, because he was black and jogging? IIRC the defendants didn’t bring up the citizens arrest claim until weeks if not months after the event.

Maybe they all got what they deserved, which was my takeaway from the Trayvon Martin incident. As for citizen arrests, that was referenced in the initial prosecutors report, which I posted a link to.

But hey, libcunt commando, let's not stop at legalizing trespassing, let's end the racist criminalization of breaking and entering. People who break into your home aren't criminals, they're human beings coming to visit you, and you should show them the same courtesy you extend to friends and family. So stop locking your doors and windows, because that's racist! 

There ya’ go again, putting words in my mouth. Plus taking a hard ride down your own made up slippery slope. I didn’t say trespassing should be made legal and I certainly didn’t suggest intruders should be invited into one’s home. You’re desperately reaching ya’ cuntservative redneck. I have no problem with people REASONABLY defending themselves or their property. Or intervening if they witness a crime. This case wasn’t that (regardless of what you think about Aubrey’s criminal history). There was much about the defendant’s racist histories that wasn’t allowed in trial. The jury found them guilty despite the fact that the prosecution didn’t spend more than a moment talking about race in closing arguments.

I know you didn't, cuntypoo, I'm saying if you were consistent with your librul, dewshbag sensibilities, you WOULD do those things. But consistency isn't something librul dewshbags are terribly familiar with -- surprise surprise.

They were within the boundaries of the law that was on the books when Arbery's time expired. The reason that jury convicted is because the Judge left it in their hands to interpret the law, which may come back to bite him in the ass. Judges interpret law, Juries interpret evidence. Capiche?