03-25-2013, 12:29 PM
(03-25-2013, 12:24 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Great find, Hot D!
Their reasoning behind keeping the photo out of the public eye is so puzzling to me. This guy was arrested back in January for having child porn on computer, there should have been a mugshot from that arrest as well.
Based on the article, I think username got it right.
Seems PD was awaiting positive witness IDs of Renz. They may not have wanted to leave open the possibility that a defense attorney could claim witnesses were influenced by a published photo.
The fact that they finally published it must mean they got the IDs they needed. Good!
Hope this guy gets the max; child predator and murderer - doesn't get worse.