08-23-2018, 01:28 AM
Unrelated to Russia and equally bad hiring decisions by Trump:
Omarosa. Really? Very bad hiring decision.
Scott Pruitt. As corrupt a grifter as they come.
Anthony Scaramucci. Booted as Communications Directors within days for making a public statement about how another questionable hire, Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, sucked his own dick.
There are more. Most of them were hired/appointed because Trump believed they were loyal to him, according to Trump himself. They were not hired because they were the most qualified candidates. And, all of them were let go because they predictably fucked-up royally. The number of firings and forced resignations is far higher than under any other presidency.
Making the argument that the high turn-over is because even better than "the best people" came along and that Trump hasn't made terrible hiring decisions is not rational or objective.
Omarosa. Really? Very bad hiring decision.
Scott Pruitt. As corrupt a grifter as they come.
Anthony Scaramucci. Booted as Communications Directors within days for making a public statement about how another questionable hire, Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, sucked his own dick.
There are more. Most of them were hired/appointed because Trump believed they were loyal to him, according to Trump himself. They were not hired because they were the most qualified candidates. And, all of them were let go because they predictably fucked-up royally. The number of firings and forced resignations is far higher than under any other presidency.
Making the argument that the high turn-over is because even better than "the best people" came along and that Trump hasn't made terrible hiring decisions is not rational or objective.