THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY

[Fry Guy]

The art of the deal.............

That loser is already renegotiating, we've gone from his big, beautiful wall to a fence and now a fence with some slats and then he posted a picture of his gorgeous slated fence which made some people say hey now, that fence has been edited to make the fence tops sharpened to dagger points. Jesus Christ.

I saw that.   



The morphing and report card of the The Wall campaign promise:

1. The Wall will be constructed of concrete slabs and Mexico is gonna pay for it, believe me!  
Grade:  F

2.  The Wall will stop drugs from coming into the country (most drugs come over the border with smugglers who cross legally, and the newly depicted fence would allow small drug packages to easily be passed through the slats).  
Grade:  D-

4.  The Wall will drastically reduce the number of illegal border crossings.  
Grade:  TBD (depends on how many overweight people try to cross illegally).

--Greased up prisoners, children, and Chinese bar patrons have often squeezed through much narrower slats, no problem.  

--According to detailed mathematical analysis of Trump's Twitter fence:

• The slats are about 10 inches wide.
  
• The gaps are nine inches.
  
• The fence is 341 inches tall — or about 28.4 feet — with 13-inch spikes on top.
  Calculations ref:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/...5bf83c3427
  

All and all..............it's just another schtick, not a wall.

Washington Post? That is not the Washington Post that is owned by Jeff Bezos the:
pro-illegal immigration,
Globalism not Nationalism,
Amazon owning,
getting rich from employing many people for low wages and bad conditions therefore a beneficiary of the sweat of illegal immigrants at Amazon;

Washington Post, is it?

You would not be pretending to use them as an unbiased source would you?

Sure you are!

So how ARE Mexico going to pay for the wall and will it be upfront, over time or in installments?

What? You don't know? What did Trump mean at the time? Not sure of that either? Well how the fuck could someone make fact based claims on this, much less grade it? Now on its face, is this honest or dishonest? Biased or non-biased? Is Washington Post credible or Fake News?

Is there ANY point to the next paragraph that some greased up prisoners could possibly slide through the space in the slates? What is it? The barrier won't stop the most determined? Is that really a thing? NO ONE thought a wall would and so no one thinks this will either. No that is not the point. Anyone that needs this explained to is willfully ignorant. A wall CAN be breached, dug under, gone around, flown over, and so on. Well know this.

It will also reduce the number of Central American women getting raped at or near the border, make gun and drug running harder, and take away the ease in which people can cross the border unreasonably.

It is like saying "A concrete wall? Ha! What if they go there with dynamite? Got you good there!"

So this D- is probably a C+ unless you are all for the horrors that come with easy border crossings.

Not to say it will be perfect but if we are arguing over the wall could be better then i agree, Chuck should allocate $26 billion and you'll have a better wall.

I guess the question is why choose such a ridiculously ideologicallt biased article to try to make a point

PS Look up "80% of Central American women" in Google