THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY

[Fry Guy]

I do not know either way. I more than suspect she got a bee in her bonnet and being the dyed in the wool righteous ideologue she is, got triggered went straight to the gutter in insults and then probably felt bad but was unable to bring herself to really hold herself accountable for it. It would be an admission that the triggering and the batshit ideology that powers it is questionable in its intent and values.

It also struck me that there was so little pushback, which got me thinking, either everyone finds it perfectly acceptable (which I am totally down with. Its easier to take off filters and be a cunt) or everyone was not happy but were scared/awkward/intimidated/confused and did not know how to address it and did nothing.

I've told you more than once that she is not the person you have described. I'm not the only one who has told you that. She is filled to the brim with honor & integrity and I trust her implicitly. She is a wonderful human and I consider myself lucky to have her as a friend.

So you say. Yet when i evidence direct contradiction to those assertions (including a sig where she literally accuses someone of rape apologia because she hold differing opinions, (someone who she apparently likes and knows) what is your reaction?

There was none. The reaction was from others saying lucky i went in to bat for that member and then being offended i had her own words in my sig.

I postulated two reasons why tbis may be so. One is you guys find that level of nasty BS acceptable or you really don't but you feel you can't react for some vague reason (gave a number of choices).

Now you can pretend i presented one option and mock that til the cows come home. But that is a little retarded.

My preferred option is you all find it acceptable. Why? Because it is gutter standard. Anything that falls short of me accussing someone of rape apologia is okay. Works for me.

I do not know either way. I more than suspect she got a bee in her bonnet and being the dyed in the wool righteous ideologue she is, got triggered went straight to the gutter in insults and then probably felt bad but was unable to bring herself to really hold herself accountable for it. It would be an admission that the triggering and the batshit ideology that powers it is questionable in its intent and values.

It also struck me that there was so little pushback, which got me thinking, either everyone finds it perfectly acceptable (which I am totally down with. Its easier to take off filters and be a cunt) or everyone was not happy but were scared/awkward/intimidated/confused and did not know how to address it and did nothing.

There is no one, and I mean no one, in Mock who is scared/awkward/intimidated or confused by the other Members.

I'm certainly not. Obviously HotD and Maggot are friends because they talk to each other on the phone so if they don't care what kind of shit they talk to each other here why the hell would I. On the other hand I don't give a shit what Fryguy puts in his sig either, I doubt HotD cried about it. He can put back his sig about me being a coke head for all I care.

Nah i will keep an eye out for another

Nice try Duchess and Sal.  I know you cower and shake in your thigh high boots when you read my posts.  ')

Seriously, that sig line and all the lectures and claims surrounding it don't feel like a wound or a scab or make things awkward here for me.  Lame drama and wasted space in the dialogue box is all.

Anyway, since Mags feels bothered enough by it to request it being taken down after all this time, I understand why he spoke up, though I'm glad he's isn't willing to delete someone else's crap.  We cool either way.......should it stay or should it go now.

Keeping an eye on you Snowflake. When you go low (like accussing someone of rape apologia) i go higher (and only act like an annoying cunt).

I wonder how much lower you, the moral authority, can go.

BTW that's the old bats reaction when Trump won.

Yeah, sure, right. You must be feeling scared or intimidated or possibly even awkward.

The funny thing was i was taking stock whilst i was removing the sig to see if maybe i HAD simply misread the forum and maybe this was not the place that it was back in the day. Maybe the calls to not be such a nasty, cantankerous curmudgeon were warranted.

Maybe what used to be acceptable is no longer. Maybe HoTD's Gutter Sliming was unacceptable and i should raise my standards accordingly. Why not? Remove the sig, change behaviour and communication style whilst at it?

But you have been very kind in mocking Hell out of one of the two alternatives and letting me know in no uncertain terms that the Gutter Sliming triggered shame tactics of HoTD done under the guise of moral lecturing and righteous indignation, is all okay.

So it makes my decision on whether to self-moderate and change very easy.