06-10-2023, 07:35 AM
(06-09-2023, 07:36 PM)rothschild Wrote: all that was presented to the GJ was what the prosecution wanted to present.
I thought the grand jury's job was to decide whether there's enough evidence to prosecute. I mean, I'm probably wrong but it's my understanding that the prosecution doesn't have to present any 'rebuttal ' evidence. The grand jury is just there to decide 'yes, there's enough evidence that we think the defendant should stand trial' or 'no, there's not enough evidence to waste taxpayer dollars ' meh-high school civics was 30 years ago.