07-14-2023, 11:58 PM
(07-14-2023, 10:24 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: Okay . . . let me see if I can be clear on my position.
I have no problem when the press observes and reports a huge investment, to a close relative of President, who (to my knowledge) doesn't possess an SEC license nor has a track record of managing a PRIVATE equity fund. (Caveat: I do hold an SEC license.)
My concern: Hunter Biden was afforded the same opportunity (albeit while his father was Vice President) with the same lack of an investment track record and no mention of possessing an SEC license . . . without any MSM reporting this . . . in both detail and quantity . . . as done with Kushner.
Additionally, the Kushner reporting also floated a blatant CONSPIRACY THEORY, implying (by their inference) it was a quid pro quo for the coverup of a journalist's murder, at the direction of a Saudi Prince . . . without any proof . . . only speculation. That was by design; not by accident. It crosses the line of factual reporting.
(Me . . . I'm more interested with Kushner's involvement with Qatar investors. If memory serves me correctly, that deal was around $1B.)
Now . . . let's look at how the corporate media reported Hunter's $3B Chinese deal and if any "conspiracies" (or shades of a quid pro quo) could be associated with his deal.
Crickets. Golly! I wonder why? The one-sidedness, of reporting, is glaring.
Hunter's appointment to the AMTRAK board is bizarre, as it occurred in 2006 . . . and he was appointed by G.W. Bush.
Must have been a Bush Skull and Bones obligation, since Hunter had zero experience with transportation.
Membership does has its privileges. Especially with secret societies.
Bill Clinton gave a shout-out to Carroll Quigley during his acceptance speech for the Democratic nomination. Quigley taught at Georgetown University and was very familiar with secret societies, writing about Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner. Monsters in my book, Quigley admired them. Unsurprisingly, Bill was a Rhodes Scholar.
Well-articulated post, Tiki.