07-11-2013, 12:01 AM
(07-10-2013, 11:37 PM)username Wrote: Who was victorious is irrelevant.
I wouldn't be too quick to discount relevance.
If his "pussy" ass was beaten by the cop, the defense might argue it triggered his fear of death or bodily harm during his ass whooping by Skittles.
If his ass was beaten, the defense might argue he'd be hesitant to engage in a physical confrontation. (However, I wouldn't use the term "Gun Shy" to describe the condition)
If his ass was beaten, the prosecution might argue the only reason tubbie elected to engage Skittles was because he had a gun and he was determined he wouldn't be beaten, again.
You can also make an argument if tubbie got the best of the cop, too.
IMO it's a bit of a stretch to conclude that two physical altercations, separated by many years, constitutes an aggressive pattern.
The fact he was forced into anger management indicates aggression . . . but not a pattern.