How was this made?

[Maggot]

And this...............

In this case, the pic resembles smooth angular shapes that are equivalent in scope. Further still is the fact that the original timeframes spanned over 20 to 30-second intervals. But moments later, the operators of the NASA rover omitted any images of the so-called pyramid taken by Curiosity.

link

I wonder what Cladking has to say about this.

Lotsa stuff coming out recently about extra terrestrials. What will happen when there is indisputable proof?

[Jimbone]

Certainly appears interesting... but I suspect it's a matter of light and shadow making something appear to be a perfect pyramid.

If you look at the original photo here:

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/...1_DXXX.jpg

you can see similar 'perfect' geometric shapes in different orientations among the scattered rock field.

Would have been nice for NASA to have taken additional photos of the area.

ETA:

Looks like they did!

Here is an image that offers a different angle and further away, taken on the following day:

http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/...1_DXXX.jpg

'Pyramid' shape is to the right of the image, use the 'obelisk' shape sticking up as a landmark to find it in both images.

[Maggot]

I cannot help but think that 100,000 years ago mars looked different than today. It reminds me of a spent planet where something went very wrong.

[crash]

Ramps

[Maggot]

Water

[Blindgreed1]

And this...............

In this case, the pic resembles smooth angular shapes that are equivalent in scope. Further still is the fact that the original timeframes spanned over 20 to 30-second intervals. But moments later, the operators of the NASA rover omitted any images of the so-called pyramid taken by Curiosity.

link

I wonder what Cladking has to say about this.

Lotsa stuff coming out recently about extra terrestrials. What will happen when there is indisputable proof?

Depends on the context of learning the truth.