Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SHE’S NOT GOING . . .
#1
. . . So Megan and her children are not going to the coronation, wonder if Charles 
really cares. It was said in the news there by Brits on the street that if Megan 
went she would have been booed! 
I can’t see why they would do that to her, considering that their future Queen
Camilla was a “home wrecker” consorting with a married man. Causing Diana and Charles to divorce. If anyone to boo it would be her. 

Megan married bachelor Harry, set up a nice home, giving him children, and seemingly making him happy. 
So why would the Brits feel the need to boo her is beyond me. 
Maybe because she was an American TV celebrity, absurd. 

Do you feel the Brits have a valid reason to boo Megan
Carsman: Loves Living Large
Home is where you're treated the best, but complain the most!
Life is short, make the most of it, get outta here!

Reply
#2
I don't. But I've already seen the comments from some here who dispise her. So they will say "yes". I think it is tasteless to do at such an event.

Reply
#3
She thought she'd be the next Di, that was never going to happen for multiple reasons.
Reply
#4
(04-14-2023, 06:06 AM)BigMark Wrote: She thought she'd be the next Di

How do you know that? Are you two pals or is this just supposition on your part?
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#5
Its an obvious yes, i would if i was there. And worse. One of the news channels here takes the piss out of both, and rightly so. Too draw a parallell with Charles and Camilla is wrong its totally different.

Charles was under extreme pressure to provide heirs, Diana came along, he didnt love her and used her as a baby machine. If you think about it the pool for Princesses who want to bear children with an idiot isnt huge. If any.

You can try and understand that, or condemn him, as in all things its not neat and tidy, he was doing his duty.

Harry has inherited his fathers stupidity, and is led by the nose by Markle, to behave in an evil way for the futherence of themselves at the Royal families expense.

WHICH IS UNNACEPTABLE.

All families are flawed and are not betrayed publically if thet are famous.

I am a royalist as most brits are, those that are not are lefty woke bastards, intent on harming Britain, indeed if i had the chance like that woman who refused to shake Markles hand fairly recently, i would not shake her hand but say something like fuck off bitch, i shit in your tea.

I have a temper, like Markle has a personality disorder. Oh, and id hope someone could read lips.
Reply
#6
(04-13-2023, 09:44 PM)Carsman Wrote: . . . So Megan and her children are not going to the coronation, wonder if Charles 
really cares. It was said in the news there by Brits on the street that if Megan 
went she would have been booed! 
I can’t see why they would do that to her, considering that their future Queen
Camilla was a “home wrecker” consorting with a married man. Causing Diana and Charles to divorce. If anyone to boo it would be her. 

Megan married bachelor Harry, set up a nice home, giving him children, and seemingly making him happy. 
So why would the Brits feel the need to boo her is beyond me. 
Maybe because she was an American TV celebrity, absurd. 

Do you feel the Brits have a valid reason to boo Megan

I think some view her as uppity and they blame her for Harry leaving. I saw him address that in one of his interviews. He left for his sanity and that of his wife. He did something the others would never do, he was vocal about it. He opened the door to the dysfunction in that family. No, I don't think they have a valid reason to boo her.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#7
Why is it our business to judge or criticize them, on who or not who . . . to boo?

Let 'em boo!  It ain't taboo, to do.
Reply
#8
Is that a picnic basket over there?
Reply
#9
(04-14-2023, 08:41 AM)Piglet Wrote: Its an obvious yes, i would if i was there.  And worse. One of the news channels here takes the piss out of both, and rightly so.  Too draw a parallell with Charles and Camilla is wrong its totally different.

hah Charles was under extreme pressure to provide heirs, Diana came along, he didnt love her and used her as a baby machine.  hah If you think about it the pool for Princesses who want to bear children with an idiot isnt huge.  If any.

You can try and understand that, or condemn him, as in all things its not neat and tidy, he was doing his duty.

Dramaqueen Harry has inherited his fathers stupidity, and is led by the nose by Markle, Dramaqueen to behave in an evil way for the futherence of themselves at the Royal families expense.

WHICH IS UNNACEPTABLE.

All families are flawed and are not betrayed publically if thet are famous.

I am a royalist as most brits are, those that are not are lefty woke bastards, intent on harming Britain, indeed if i had the chance like that woman who refused to shake Markles  hand fairly recently, i would not shake her hand but say something like fuck off bitch,  i shit in your tea.

I have a temper, like Markle has a personality disorder.    Oh, and id hope someone could read lips.
hah For Charles being a “Royal”, it was not very “Noble” of him using Diana just as a baby machine! 

Dramaqueen As for Harry, he has a mind of his own and does whatever he wants! He is too back in line so he will 
never become King so he likely feels he doesn’t have to deal with all the pomp and circumstance nuisance
Carsman: Loves Living Large
Home is where you're treated the best, but complain the most!
Life is short, make the most of it, get outta here!

Reply