Poll: How important are rep points to you?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
They validate my very existence!
9.09%
1 9.09%
They're fun but unimportant
45.45%
5 45.45%
Meaningless and sort of stupid
45.45%
5 45.45%
What are rep points?
0%
0 0%
Total 11 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How important are rep points to you?
#21
This poll sucks because there is absolutely no option for something like "they are important." You have to make them validate your friggin existence to vote for them having meaning.
86 112
Reply
#22
(12-18-2009, 09:48 PM)sally Wrote:
(12-18-2009, 09:31 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I have earned the zero I have, it pisses me off to go into the plus numbers.

its one thing to come to mock and get and give others shit but its really another for people to think you're nice about it and give you a fucking point for it to show everybody what a lame assed mocker you really are.


Hey, keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better 11

Look it up matilda, this is not the first time I have said it.

the points are for nice, thats not the point though is it?::laughp::
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#23
Matilda. 28
86 112
Reply
#24
(12-18-2009, 10:04 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: This poll sucks because there is absolutely no option for something like "they are important." You have to make them validate your friggin existence to vote for them having meaning.

oh hell here we go with the whiny shit from the short in more ways than one admin bitch.86
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#25
Ha ha!
Reply
#26
The total misuse you guys have made of the "Reputation" function is kinda pathetic really. Like I should have a huge rep for geekiness and making the site rock. Duchess should have a huge rep as a flirt. Frank should have a rep as a guido. OP should have a rep as a P.C. fuckwad. Everyone is instead using the rep system as a popularity bullshit, instead of pointing out the true reputations of the people in question. Also there are too many "revenge" reps, like someone giving someone else a negative rep that isn't true just because that someone gave them a negative that WAS true. In other words, you're all being whiny bitch children with it. So... fuck you all Smiley_emoticons_smile
Reply
#27
(12-18-2009, 10:29 PM)D Wrote: The total misuse you guys have made of the "Reputation" function is kinda pathetic really. Like I should have a huge rep for geekiness and making the site rock. Duchess should have a huge rep as a flirt. Frank should have a rep as a guido. OP should have a rep as a P.C. fuckwad. Everyone is instead using the rep system as a popularity bullshit, instead of pointing out the true reputations of the people in question. Also there are too many "revenge" reps, like someone giving someone else a negative rep that isn't true just because that someone gave them a negative that WAS true. In other words, you're all being whiny bitch children with it. So... fuck you all Smiley_emoticons_smile

You mean like this:

Ordinary Peephole (4) - Last updated 12-08-2009, 11:57 AM

Negative (-2): For playing with his PC instead of cock and ruining the format of mock with his "expertise"
Reply
#28
(12-18-2009, 10:29 PM)D Wrote: The total misuse you guys have made of the "Reputation" function is kinda pathetic really. Like I should have a huge rep for geekiness and making the site rock. Duchess should have a huge rep as a flirt. Frank should have a rep as a guido. OP should have a rep as a P.C. fuckwad. Everyone is instead using the rep system as a popularity bullshit, instead of pointing out the true reputations of the people in question. Also there are too many "revenge" reps, like someone giving someone else a negative rep that isn't true just because that someone gave them a negative that WAS true. In other words, you're all being whiny bitch children with it. So... fuck you all Smiley_emoticons_smile

Fuck off, D. Just fuck off 86
Reply
#29
@Lumpy: pretty much

@Sally: I would, but you're not here, head down, ass up, and lacking clothing.
Reply
#30
(12-18-2009, 10:29 PM)D Wrote: The total misuse you guys have made of the "Reputation" function is kinda pathetic really. Like I should have a huge rep for geekiness and making the site rock. Duchess should have a huge rep as a flirt. Frank should have a rep as a guido. OP should have a rep as a P.C. fuckwad. Everyone is instead using the rep system as a popularity bullshit, instead of pointing out the true reputations of the people in question. Also there are too many "revenge" reps, like someone giving someone else a negative rep that isn't true just because that someone gave them a negative that WAS true. In other words, you're all being whiny bitch children with it. So... fuck you all Smiley_emoticons_smile

damn I wish I would have though of this shit, I could have been fucking famous.

way to go geek.
you have got to be the second most irritating fucking person on the forum.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#31
How come only the mock elder group gets to warn each other and we can't give out warnings to the lesser members? You'd think the elders would have the fun of fucking around with the others instead of each other in this regard.

Frank, learn how to use the goddamn software.
Reply
#32
Agreed.

And this is just another confirmation that Frank is a lazy, stupid person. Really stupid.
Reply
#33
(12-19-2009, 09:59 AM)The Antagonist Wrote: How come only the mock elder group gets to warn each other and we can't give out warnings to the lesser members? You'd think the elders would have the fun of fucking around with the others instead of each other in this regard.

Frank, learn how to use the goddamn software.

That's what I intended. For some reason the Mock Member group had the ability to receive warnings unchecked. I thought I had it checked. My fault or one of those occassional resets I've seen with the software for one reason or the other? I'm not sure, but I'll be a man with a slightly above average penis length and take the blame. I fixed the warnings issue.
86 112
Reply
#34
(12-19-2009, 10:01 AM)LuMPyPussy Wrote: Agreed.

And this is just another confirmation that Frank is a lazy, stupid person. Really stupid.

I so fucking hate you ...
86 112
Reply
#35
Occasional Resets with the software? What are you talking about?
Reply
#36
And your penis length is not above average. 11
Reply
#37
(12-19-2009, 10:33 AM)The Antagonist Wrote: Occasional Resets with the software? What are you talking about?

His dope inspired dreams I think.
Reply
#38
(12-19-2009, 10:33 AM)The Antagonist Wrote: Occasional Resets with the software? What are you talking about?

Once in a while I noticed an area will go back to default. Could be my fault but doesn't matter, minor issue either way.
86 112
Reply
#39
(12-19-2009, 10:34 AM)The Antagonist Wrote: And your penis length is not above average. 11

it is if you believe him when he lies about it.:O
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply