Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
FORECLOSURE
#1


I think it's awful that soldiers away from home fighting in the war are losing their homes to foreclosure. Smiley_emoticons_slash
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#2
National Guard or Regular Military?
Reply
#3


Active duty military.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#4
(05-06-2011, 03:32 PM)Duchess Wrote: Active duty military

As a former military man, I can only think of one way an active duty service member would lose their home to foreclosure. They bought too much home on an ARM, and it came due. They tried to sell, which was the original plan all along, but, with the housing market in the tank, it didn't work.

If it were National Guard members, I'd be screaming "outrage", but I actually believe there's some sort of law in place, that a National Guard member, or Reservist, cannot lose their home.
Reply
#5
I guess my question is: "How did they qualify for a mortgage and what type of mortgage did they choose?"

Usually, deployed troops receive additional pay.

It is fucked-up when we bail out stupid ass corporations and investors, while security forces are losing their homes, fighting for the freedom to allow us to live in our own homes.
Reply
#6


Pilfered ~

According to a report released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Thursday, two of America's largest mortgage firms unlawfully seized the homes of almost 50 active duty members of the US military, The Huffington Post reported.

The GAO noted that many of such instances occurred because the mortgage service companies did not bother to check on an individual's service status before they foreclosed.

The wrongful foreclosures were discovered during a review of only about 2,800 loans that experienced foreclosure last year.

The finding has led to calls for national standards for foreclosure processes and better government oversight.

"The idea of wrongfully forcing service members' families from their homes while their loved ones are risking their lives to protect our country is not only unconscionable, it's illegal," Senator Al Franken (D-Minn.) said.

His remarks come as several senators have written a letter to banking regulators, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

"We have seen countless examples of servicers giving borrowers the run-around and continuing the foreclosure process when a loan modification has already been obtained," the letter read.

It added, "Perhaps the most egregious cases of servicer wrongdoing have been violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act by wrongly foreclosing on active duty service members. Correcting these problems and ensuring they do not reoccur should be a priority for all of your agencies."

Members of the armed forces on active duty are covered by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.

The law is designed to protect them from financial distress, and restricts the foreclosure of properties owned by active duty members of the US military.

According to California-based data provider RealtyTrac, more than 2.8 million homes received a foreclosure filing in 2009, and nearly 2.9 million residences got one last year.

This comes as millions of foreclosures in the United States have not been reviewed by banking regulators in recent years.


[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#7
I thought the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act prohibited that. NM, I see it is SUPPOSED to prevent a foreclosure while an active duty soldier is deployed. People need to raise hell.
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
Reply