Mock › Serious Shit? › Discussions, Opinions & Debate v
Conservative's Assertions re: Obama Admin

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
Conservative's Assertions re: Obama Admin
Cracker Away
White Devil
**
Posts: 12,251
Threads: 189
Joined: Feb 2010
#81
05-21-2012, 05:21 PM
(05-21-2012, 05:07 PM)shitstorm Wrote: If I had been the one to post what Cracker did, there would have been a couple of sheep posting about "conspiracy theories"!

People like me more. And I have other stuff to say besides the fringe political stuff.

Be less obsessed.

And don't post an entire work. People get bored easily.
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
Reply
shitstorm Offline
Mocker
**
Posts: 1,867
Threads: 33
Joined: Feb 2011
#82
05-21-2012, 05:31 PM
(05-21-2012, 05:21 PM)Cracker Wrote:
(05-21-2012, 05:07 PM)shitstorm Wrote: If I had been the one to post what Cracker did, there would have been a couple of sheep posting about "conspiracy theories"!

People like me more. And I have other stuff to say besides the fringe political stuff.

Be less obsessed.

And don't post an entire work. People get bored easily.


I'm obsessed, I admit it. I have been since I learned the truth about the Federal Reserve and the IRS, in 1980. Both of those are private corporations, too.
Reply
Cracker Away
White Devil
**
Posts: 12,251
Threads: 189
Joined: Feb 2010
#83
05-21-2012, 05:38 PM
I always thought you were a teenager. Please delete the racy PM I just sent you.
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
Reply
Ma Huang Sor Offline
Mocker
Posts: 3,557
Threads: 127
Joined: Apr 2012
#84
05-21-2012, 06:02 PM
You do sexy talk by PM? Bass Ass Grin
Reply
HairOfTheDog Offline
Moderator
*****
Posts: 29,189
Threads: 391
Joined: Aug 2011
#85
05-21-2012, 06:07 PM
(05-20-2012, 10:32 PM)username Wrote: The problem isn't who gave what to whom, it's the legality of all this money going in to campaigns (directly or through the super pacs).

The super pac contributions are of concern to me as well.

It surprised me to learn a few months back that more than half of the funds raised by super pacs for this election are a product of just 24 extremely wealthy people (via their ability to make unlimited corporate contributions through the pac); mostly for the Republican candidates. Link to the February article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/22...94598.html

Here's a link to a really useful site, if you're interested in details of the super pac contributions:
http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/...uper-pacs/

The site provides a list of the latest super pacs; you can click to see who they support, who they oppose and the amounts/types of expenditures contributed. You can even see the pac's FEC filings in PDF format with one easy click from the site too (but I don't go that deep). One of Romney's pacs spent more on efforts to oppose Santorum than to directly advocate for Romney in the last filing; I think it paid off.
Reply