01-12-2012, 01:20 PM
should this be permitted on the basis it is historical and an antique?
i think it's a slim transparent excuse.
i read the sign has been stolen.
![[Image: 120112044253-early-ohio-white-only-pool-...ry-top.jpg]](http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/dam/assets/120112044253-early-ohio-white-only-pool-sign-00003804-story-top.jpg)
(CNN) -- A landlord wants the Ohio Civil Rights Commission on Thursday to reconsider its finding that she violated the law by posting a "white only" sign at her swimming pool.
Jamie Hein did not respond to a request for comment at the time. But she told ABC News in December that she collects antiques. She said the sign, which was dated 1931 and from Alabama, was a gift from a friend.
"I don't have any problem with race at all. It's a historical sign," she told ABC.
i think it's a slim transparent excuse.
i read the sign has been stolen.
(CNN) -- A landlord wants the Ohio Civil Rights Commission on Thursday to reconsider its finding that she violated the law by posting a "white only" sign at her swimming pool.
Jamie Hein did not respond to a request for comment at the time. But she told ABC News in December that she collects antiques. She said the sign, which was dated 1931 and from Alabama, was a gift from a friend.
"I don't have any problem with race at all. It's a historical sign," she told ABC.