06-24-2014, 06:44 PM
(06-24-2014, 05:34 PM)Cutz Wrote:Some of us (at least Az Wildcat fans and Chip Kelly) knew he was an amazing pocket passer with tons of potential at the NFL level.(06-24-2014, 04:04 PM)Blindgreed1 Wrote:I really paint Foles as a young Brady. A mid round pick nobody expected terribly much from, comes in and performs for no specific reason. Tommy won much more in a much shorter time span, which is why he's the golden child whereas people call Foles a fluke, but it's like handing Musgrave the keys to a Ferrari and saying "now just don't scratch it."(06-24-2014, 02:18 PM)Duchess Wrote:Hell no it can't be considered a fluke and I think Musgrave will be working more with Barkley and Sanchez than he will with Foles. Like Cutz pointed out, there's not much a QB coach can do with Foles because he's already solid, it's just development and experience from here on out.
I've been seeing quite a few sports writers saying that Nick's awesome season last year was a fluke. Can an almost full season even be considered a fluke? Maybe I just need to stop reading and wait for the games because now I'm concerned about our QB coach.