Poll: Should she run?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
100.00%
4 100.00%
No
0%
0 0%
Total 4 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should Oprah run for President?
#21
No. I like Oprah just like everyone else but I really don't think we need to make celebrities being our presidents into a "thing"
Reply
#22
Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?
Reply
#23
(01-11-2018, 04:05 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?

Well, they are not sure because they can never agree on anything for starters. I think she would make a good President, maybe even better than President Trump.
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#24
(01-09-2018, 03:04 PM)Duchess Wrote:

A firm no from me. She has a very nice life and she shouldn't give it up to work for a bunch of ingrates. Fuck the little people. Stay away, Oprah, stay far, far away.
I'm going to wait and see what Aussie says. She and Oprah are BFF's.
Reply
#25
(01-11-2018, 04:05 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?

Which libs? Where were "they" doing this?
Reply
#26
(01-11-2018, 05:45 PM)Love Child Wrote:
(01-11-2018, 04:05 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?

Which libs? Where were "they" doing this?

Check, "yahoo" or "newsweek" or any of those. They want a "professional" politician. What does that even mean?
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#27
(01-11-2018, 08:47 PM)Maggot Wrote:
(01-11-2018, 05:45 PM)Love Child Wrote:
(01-11-2018, 04:05 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?

Which libs? Where were "they" doing this?

Check, "yahoo" or "newsweek" or any of those. They want a "professional" politician. What does that even mean?

you can also click "comments" on most articles. Much like Facebook. Speaking of that where the hell is Ramseykittens?
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#28
(01-11-2018, 05:29 PM)Maggot Wrote:
(01-11-2018, 04:05 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?

Well, they are not sure because they can never agree on anything for starters. I think she would make a good President, maybe even better than President Trump.

Oh please. You're so full of shit Mags. You've made your feelings about Oprah clear for years. If I recall correctly, they weren't positive.

If you're banking on her losing big time should she choose to run -- which I don't think she will, but has the right to do and is certainly as or more qualified than others who've tossed their hats in the ring -- I wouldn't be too confident.

I didn't think I'd end up voting for Hillary Clinton three years ago. That changed when it came down to a choice between her and Trump. She was certainly more directly qualified for the job in terms of political experience, but not well-liked by a whole lot of people.

And, I didn't think someone less directly qualified in terms of political experience and also not well-liked by a whole lot of people, but worshipped by some, would pull off an electoral college victory. But, that he did.

I don't imagine myself voting for Oprah for President if she surprises me and runs. But, I guess I might........depending on the other choices.
Reply
#29
I don't "love" Oprah that's true but she would be a better choice than 99% of whats out there. I don't think she's virginal enough and not sure anyone is without sin in today's world.
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#30
(01-11-2018, 08:47 PM)Maggot Wrote:
(01-11-2018, 05:45 PM)Love Child Wrote:
(01-11-2018, 04:05 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: Hmmm...so in 2016 the libs are screaming that being a reality show star and rich was NOT a qualification for the highest office in the land...and now its opera 2020?
WTF?

Which libs? Where were "they" doing this?

Check, "yahoo" or "newsweek" or any of those. They want a "professional" politician. What does that even mean?

I believe it was more than just the fact that Trump was a reality TV star and rich that the Libs or Dems did not want him being president.
Reply
#31


It was way more. He does not reflect the views of most of America, not in any way, shape or form. He is everything most parents don't want their children to be.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#32
.

The "Guy in charge" has had more "passes" on his many indiscretions ("in only one year") than any other Guy before him in charge, during their entire term!
Enough is enough already!
Down right disrespectful on all levels, it's way past embarrassing!

The second in command as of late, has seemed to have fallen by the wayside!

Oprah or Donald, Donald or Oprah, Oprah or Donald, tough choice right?

After giving serious thought, I believe Oprah would not be a good choice.
(Donald not good choice either though)

New faces S/B exercised for the Dems, such as Andrew Cuomo Gov NY, or Sen Kamala Harris to name a couple.

New faces S/B exercised for the Reps, such as US Ambass Nikki Haley, or Sen Ben Sasse to name a couple.
Carsman: Loves Living Large

Life is short, make the most of it, get outta here!
Reply
#33
hah So what do YOU think Cars?
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#34
Condoleezza Rice with Mindy Finn as VP.
Reply
#35
I bet he knocked the bottom out.


[Image: oprah-winfrey-donald-trump]
Reply
#36
He may have been the one that turned her lesbian.
Reply
#37
It's weird that some men assume Oprah is gay just because she's very close friends with a woman, even though she's been with the same man for decades.

They're usually the same men who assume Hillary Clinton is gay because she has a female assistant, even though she's been married to the same man for decades.

Psychologists suggest that those men are harboring serious latent homosexual tendencies and thus project their repressed desire for their male friends and colleagues onto strong females. Poor guys.
Reply
#38
Let’s see, I love big tits, can throw a football 50 yards, can make an NBA 3 pointer, can drive a golf ball nearly 300 yards and most importantly have ZERO fashion sense... and you think I’m a homo?

You can insinuate I’m many things and you could possibly be right, but in this case, wrongo.
Reply
#39
You have to admit President Trump looked pretty good back then. Sarcastic
You couldn't get a clue during the clue mating season in a field full of horny clues if you smeared your body with clue musk and did the clue mating dance.
Reply
#40
He looked like a new york douche.
Reply