02-21-2011, 10:16 PM
(02-21-2011, 10:01 PM)Lady Cop Wrote:(02-21-2011, 09:49 PM)Inspector Gary Wrote:(02-21-2011, 04:39 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i am lost. someone hook me up with the facebook you are talking about.
Hey! I posted info about this 2 days ago (pg. 350, #4895).
There was a scolding soon afterward, "we are getting really far afield here with speculating about the facebook pages of totally unrelated people." So, I backed off.
But, these are not totally unrelated people- they are all connected. :O
These people really stood out to me as well. I see everyone else is putting initials, and sorry if I'm wrong, but it is my understanding you can NOT put personal info out. This is all public info on the internet, and no minors are named. So, I hope that it was okay for me to post in this manner. If not, my apologies, and please let me know for the future. Thanks!
it was getting very confusing with MANY sets of initials. i wasn't certain WHO was being referenced.
when i say connected, i mean with the case, not connected through friendships and fb pages.
it IS hard to keep all the people straight, i just can't have a bunch of people named and the subject of speculation until there is a nexus to the crime itself. it's not fair to them.
my goal is simply using good judgement and discretion here.
I understand.
My reason for putting the names out there was twofold. (1) There was a post suggesting that the initials were getting too confusing and that it was okay to use names as long as you were not including personal information, a minor's name, or a threat. (2) I thought it might help with some of the discussion, as we are trying to seek information and figure out possible pieces of the puzzle.
I completely respect where you are coming from about putting names out there and will be very careful in the future!!
