03-07-2011, 10:53 PM
(03-07-2011, 10:40 PM)Adub Wrote:(03-07-2011, 10:25 PM)van64 Wrote:(03-07-2011, 10:21 PM)Adub Wrote:The question concerned a comment made regarding LE's belief that the perps were no longer in the area. The sheriff's news release did not address that issue either way. But thanks for your input.(03-07-2011, 10:15 PM)van64 Wrote: Concerned, I think you were the one who had not seen this article referencing the belief of LE that the perps are no longer in the area. You have to read down to see it but it is there. LC has posted this in the thread about links to the case.
Slick link ther van64, pretty much been discussed and ripped apart, even before today's BOMBSHELL!
Sheriff Telb disses one of his own" read all about it just click on the link..
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvg/story?sectio...id=7999254
Okay, I'm game. No longer in the area is a bit ambiguous don't you THINK? Nowhere did the Sgt say out of state, out of the friggin country, or out of anywhere but the "area". And who was the Sgt addressing? The Springfield Township Trustees. So shall we take the Sgt's words in context or out? You decide. I decided two or three days ago. Area = Straub's neighborhood.
I think the audience Schiavone was addressing as well as the tone of the discussion is extremely important to how the Sgt's comments are taken. It certainly wasn't a formal statement by LE, was contradicted by today's formal statement and is questionable given the Sgt's choice of wording with "instigated."
In my opinion, all of the above make me question Schiavone's statement about drug charges against Lisa.