03-11-2011, 01:35 AM
(03-10-2011, 03:56 AM)concerned Wrote: Another thought I have is this.... Now read this and think about the actual crime scene. I know for a fact that this crime scene was a " massacre". I will get this out of the way and let you all know I am "UNKNOWN" sister. Whoever did this had to have left the crime scene covered in blood. No way around it.
I'm sorry but I'm really having a hard time believing that the crime scene was a "massacre" or as bloody as some have said. I mean doesn't it seem very strange and odd that Maytee NEVER said a word about blood except for a little blood on the side of Lisa's head? Even in the heat of the moment when Maytee called 911 and was hysterical describing the crime scene to the operator ("they were laying w/bags over their heads and duct tape, phone on the chest, lisa has no shirt/pants on", etc) not a PEEP about a ton of blood? I watch a lot of true crime shows and many real 911 calls and almost always the person calling 911 talks about "their's blood everywhere!" or "he/she's covered in blood!" etc. It's just so weird to me that something like that would not get mentioned in the 911 calls, the TV interview that Maytee gave describing the scene, etc. Granted, she probably didn't see the scene herself, but wouldn't the John Sr. tell her about it?
Also, if John Sr. went up to both bodies and removed the bags, wouldn't he essentially have blood on him? Has anyone heard about this?? I suppose it could have been dried up by then... ack.. I dont know!!