04-13-2011, 10:00 PM
(04-13-2011, 09:18 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote:(04-13-2011, 08:49 PM)curious Wrote:
JC was also released early. Do you know why? I do. Because JC was WITH someone who robbed someone with a gun but JC himself was not in possession of the gun. Do you know that if you drive your friend to the carry out & they go in & rob someone, you could also be charged with robbery for driving the car? I'm not saying that JC was an angel, obviously he was not BUT he was, to my knowledge, in no way at the same level as AG.
I believe the technical term would be guilt by association...seems like there's a lot if that being thrown around. All I'm trying to do is disertain why anyone at this point in the investigation, only knowing what they know through cyberspace (most, not all), would appear so defensive of people who they claim they've never met?
Having an opinion is one thing, but those wishing ill-will upon others (quotes provided upon request) based on FB goings-on, seems like big 'ole hypocrites to me. Let's just hope they're not part of the jury when this goes to trial.