CUT & RUN: FUGITIVE FROM CIRCUMCISION

[HairOfTheDog]

I'm not going to be interested in a mole like penis.

Deal breaker!

Obviously it doesn't bother me, but even if it did I still don't think I'd throw some of these men out of bed.

http://www.ranker.com/list/340-and-uncir...w.2&page=4

If Javier Bardem and I were lying in bed all single and he pulled a hard-headed, extra-sensitive mole outta his pocket, I'd not kick him out. I'd embrace the mole -- I'm deep like that.

Now, Marty Feldman, on the other hand...


(I don't care one way or the other either.)

[HairOfTheDog]

Are there any grown men who would willingly offer up their penis to be mutilated? Would any of the males in Mock?

I think all of the Mock Men are cupping their crotches and staying the hell outta this thread.

Wonder if they think that you, sally, blueberry and I are lingering about, nice shiny scalpels in hand, waiting for them to answer your question.

Maggot is the only one brave enough to poke his head in; he's got thick skin though.

[Maggot]

Call me "Mole-man"

[Duchess]

Call me "Mole-man"

Mr. Mole-man, is that you in your av?

[sally]

Javier Bardem

Come to mama, you freaky little mole-man.

[HairOfTheDog]

Oh yeah.

I don't blame lucky bitch Cruz one bit for putting a ring on that mole.

(Penelope, I mean -- not Ted.)

[sally]

"So you're telling me your penis isn't cut?" "Get the fuck up out of my house mofo!"

[HairOfTheDog]

Duchess picks up Charlie Hunnam at the bar.....


"Charlie, baby, take off your shirt. Uh huh -- that's right."

"Now, lose the fucking belt baby. Ummmmm."



"C'mere -- let's get those pants off your fine ass. Oh yeah, yeah.......WAIT, HOLD UP!!!......... ...... WTF?!?"

"A turtleneck -- in the Spring?!?! Holey moley."

"Bounce, Charlie.............. And don't let the door hit ya in the ass on the way out!"

[sally]

My husband kind of looked like that when he was younger. And even though he's not looking like that anymore the thought of 'intact and hard' kind of puts me in the mood.

Unfortunately he's sleeping, snoring and farting. It's an instant mood killer.

[HairOfTheDog]

Sometimes you have to be creative and use some props to keep things spicy in a marriage, sal. That's what Dr. Ruth says.

A sweat sock, two cotton balls, and a cork could put you right back in the mood.

Just don't dilly-dally around about it...

[Duchess]

I'm so lucky I get to start my days like this.

[Maggot]

Call me "Mole-man"

Mr. Mole-man, is that you in your av?

No! That's a maggot you freaky bodacious big boobed mama.

[Duchess]

Is bodacious a good thing?

[Duchess]

It is!

[HairOfTheDog]

So, (contested) health benefits, cultural/traditional beliefs, and religious doctrines seem to be why a majority of American parents request or allow their baby boys to be circumcised.

How about the hospitals, doctors and other medical professionals -- do they have a vested interest in foreskin removal?

According to a new article I saw this morning, you bet your a$$ they do.

Snip (npi):
When you go into a hospital, do you expect the hospital and biotech industries to make a profit from your surgical specimens? Well in the case of circumcision, your child’s foreskin could be making thousands of dollars for the biotech industry.

A baby’s foreskin is full of cells, called fibroblasts, that produce structural proteins like collagen. When fibroblasts are extracted, multiple products can be developed, such as artificial skin for plastic surgery, injectable wrinkle treatments and even skin creams that sell for hundreds of dollars per jar.

The ethical question is: Should you be informed that your child’s foreskin is going to become a profitable commodity? Circumcision continues to be a controversial topic, but the majority of people don’t realize that many of the byproducts from human bodies translate to big bucks for biotech companies.

The question that I have is: Who does that foreskin belong to? Right now, this industry is not very well regulated. Yes, the FDA keeps tabs on tissue banks nationally, but many of them also have affiliations and partnerships outside the U.S. where the FDA has no regulatory control.

Story: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2015/03/23...-eyebrows/

[Duchess]

The question that I have is: Who does that foreskin belong to?

I think up until it is removed it obviously belongs to the person but once removed it would be considered trash, for lack of a better word, and then it would belong to whoever is disposing of it. I'm sorta relating it to the cops needing a search warrant to go through someone's trash but once it's at the curb it's fair game...or something like that.

[Maggot]

I thought they sold them to the cosmetic industry for lip gloss or something.

[Duchess]

[Duchess]

*spits*

[HairOfTheDog]

I can is see it from your viewpoint Duchess.

Here's how the author of the article, Dr. Manny, sees it:

I don’t see a lot of disclosure or transparency by medical centers in their contractual agreements they may have with biotech companies in regards to selling human byproducts. It’s important to note this is not the same as patients donating tissue like bone marrow or organs that are very regulated, and in my opinion, doing God’s work. But when the tissue that is up for grabs is being sold off without the patient’s knowledge, is that ethical? I don’t think it is, and I want to hear from you about what you think about this topic.

In the meantime, celebrities from Oprah Winfrey to Barbara Walters have reportedly promoted the skin benefits of facial creams made from foreskin cells. Well, let me tell you a fact I am certain of: At the end of the day, we’re all going to get old. We should all just accept that sooner or later your skin reflects your age.

I can see Dr. Manny's point too.

The story makes me wonder. Do some doctors and hospitals -- when consulting with new parents -- minimize the risks and disadvantages of surgically altering their babies' penises and exaggerate the supposed advantages because it benefits them financially to do so? That would piss me off.