Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 2.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TRUMP IMPEACHMENT
(01-30-2020, 01:39 AM)BigMark Wrote:
(01-29-2020, 08:49 PM)MirahM Wrote:
(01-29-2020, 12:41 PM)Maggot Wrote: I would need a toe ring, it's all the rage with supreme rulers today.

Can I paint your toe nails?
Holy crap why does that make me horny?

I know
Or
I don't know

Can I paint yours too?

Reply
I really DO NOT want to be in ANY of BM's fantasy's and I'm wearing 3 pairs of socks now.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
I put the ornery in horny.
Reply
(01-29-2020, 08:40 PM)Rootilda Wrote: It's fake


28  You got me good.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
I don't bait very well. Sorry.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
Strange, you look kind of like a beached grouper.
Sally, the flaming asshole of MockForums
[Image: xzwbrP0.png]
Reply
I do have maggots crawling out of my eyes. it doesn't make me a bad person though.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
And the ladies seem to like you.
[Image: RedGrouperPagePic1-1024x487.png]
Sally, the flaming asshole of MockForums
[Image: xzwbrP0.png]
Reply
That's creepy.
Reply
Another day of the fake trial, just puttin' in time while we wait for the fake acquittal. 
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
(01-30-2020, 01:52 PM)BigMark Wrote: That's creepy.

You saved a photo of my armpit cyst, you have no moral high ground to stand on.
Sally, the flaming asshole of MockForums
[Image: xzwbrP0.png]
Reply
(01-30-2020, 02:04 PM)Duchess Wrote: Another day of the fake trial, just puttin' in time while we wait for the fake acquittal. 

I agree its a fake trial but its a real acquittal.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
No no no, it was a real zit.
Reply
(01-30-2020, 03:22 PM)Maggot Wrote: I agree its a fake trial but its a real acquittal.


hah  Nope. You don't get to have it both ways, republican man. 
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
Maggot thinks a fake trial is going to produce a genuine acquittal. I can't get over that logic.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
You put the ake in fake.
Reply
105
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
Shouldn't that be "ache"?
Sally, the flaming asshole of MockForums
[Image: xzwbrP0.png]
Reply
(01-29-2020, 04:43 PM)Duchess Wrote: Did Alan Dershowitz really argue that a presidential quid pro quo aimed at helping one's reelection is not impeachable? Surely I misunderstood.
 
You did not misunderstand.  Dershowitz claimed that as long as the President believes his re-election to be good for the country, the President's abuse of power with regards to re-election is not impeachable.

It's bullshit, of course, in my opinion (and the opinions of all the real constitutional scholars).  Dershowitz's attempt to excuse such abuse of power based on the President's supposed intent is not consistent with the founding fathers' intent.  If it were, there would be no impeachment article in the Constitution and every abuse of power would be easily brushed aside with no remedy.

Anyway, I've seen/heard some pundits state that Dershowitz's claims are so ridiculous that none of the Republican senators will attempt to use them as justification/cover when voting to acquit.  I disagree with the latter -- I fully expect that several Republican senators will cite Dershowitz's claims as cover/justification when they vote to acquit Trump. 

Guess we'll find out soon enough.
Reply
Fache news.
Reply