Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Press 1 for english
#61
Regardless of the retard dictionary you found your info from, killing inhumanely is the issue.

No one rejected the food chain. We just think that you're a cold cunt who thinks killing and suffering mean nothing if it's not you or yours.
Reply
#62
(12-06-2009, 09:22 PM)IMaDick Wrote: why am I not surprised? you have shown yourself to be intellectually dishonest, is that a human trait or an animal trait ?

You said to supply my own definitions. I did. Anyone can copy/paste.

dick Wrote:ANIMAL

–noun 1. any member of the kingdom Animalia, comprising multicellular organisms that have a well-defined shape and usually limited growth, can move voluntarily, actively acquire food and digest it internally, and have sensory and nervous systems that allow them to respond rapidly to stimuli: some classification schemes also include protozoa and certain other single-celled eukaryotes that have motility and animallike nutritional modes.
2. any such living thing other than a human being.
3. a mammal, as opposed to a fish, bird, etc.
4. the physical, sensual, or carnal nature of human beings; animality: the animal in every person.
5. an inhuman person; brutish or beastlike person: She married an animal.
6. thing: A perfect job? Is there any such animal?

HUMAN


–adjective 1. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or having the nature of people: human frailty.
2. consisting of people: the human race.
3. of or pertaining to the social aspect of people: human affairs.
4. sympathetic; humane: a warmly human understanding

The only real thing we have in common with animals is bodily function, the genus of animals is completely different , body temperature is completely different , instinctively animals are far superior to humans far less frail and far more likely to survive in many different aspects than humans.


if we are animals we are on the bottom of the food chain.

now you may have an argument if you try for likenesses as mammals but as far as science is concerned animals and humans are completely different animals.::bigsmile::

You twit.

Here's a simple logic puzzle for you.

If all humans are primates and all primates are animals, are humans animals?

(duuuuuuhhhhh)
Reply
#63
(12-06-2009, 09:46 PM)SyberBitch Wrote:
(12-06-2009, 09:22 PM)IMaDick Wrote: why am I not surprised? you have shown yourself to be intellectually dishonest, is that a human trait or an animal trait ?

You said to supply my own definitions. I did. Anyone can copy/paste.

dick Wrote:ANIMAL

–noun 1. any member of the kingdom Animalia, comprising multicellular organisms that have a well-defined shape and usually limited growth, can move voluntarily, actively acquire food and digest it internally, and have sensory and nervous systems that allow them to respond rapidly to stimuli: some classification schemes also include protozoa and certain other single-celled eukaryotes that have motility and animallike nutritional modes.
2. any such living thing other than a human being.
3. a mammal, as opposed to a fish, bird, etc.
4. the physical, sensual, or carnal nature of human beings; animality: the animal in every person.
5. an inhuman person; brutish or beastlike person: She married an animal.
6. thing: A perfect job? Is there any such animal?

HUMAN


–adjective 1. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or having the nature of people: human frailty.
2. consisting of people: the human race.
3. of or pertaining to the social aspect of people: human affairs.
4. sympathetic; humane: a warmly human understanding

The only real thing we have in common with animals is bodily function, the genus of animals is completely different , body temperature is completely different , instinctively animals are far superior to humans far less frail and far more likely to survive in many different aspects than humans.


if we are animals we are on the bottom of the food chain.

now you may have an argument if you try for likenesses as mammals but as far as science is concerned animals and humans are completely different animals.::bigsmile::

You twit.

Here's a simple logic puzzle for you.

If all humans are primates and all primates are animals, are humans animals?

(duuuuuuhhhhh)

primates lack a gene that would make them human.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#64
(12-06-2009, 09:24 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: Regardless of the retard dictionary you found your info from, killing inhumanely is the issue.

No one rejected the food chain. We just think that you're a cold cunt who thinks killing and suffering mean nothing if it's not you or yours.

If the pelts were not used I would agree with you.

some animals are food animals some animals are fur,leather and hyde animals, some animals are domestic and make good pets and companions, some are work animals, and humans are the end users in most cases of all the different classes ,stop being a hypocrite about the subject.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#65
(12-06-2009, 09:46 PM)SyberBitch Wrote:
(12-06-2009, 09:22 PM)IMaDick Wrote: why am I not surprised? you have shown yourself to be intellectually dishonest, is that a human trait or an animal trait ?

You said to supply my own definitions. I did. Anyone can copy/paste.

dick Wrote:ANIMAL

–noun 1. any member of the kingdom Animalia, comprising multicellular organisms that have a well-defined shape and usually limited growth, can move voluntarily, actively acquire food and digest it internally, and have sensory and nervous systems that allow them to respond rapidly to stimuli: some classification schemes also include protozoa and certain other single-celled eukaryotes that have motility and animallike nutritional modes.
2. any such living thing other than a human being.
3. a mammal, as opposed to a fish, bird, etc.
4. the physical, sensual, or carnal nature of human beings; animality: the animal in every person.
5. an inhuman person; brutish or beastlike person: She married an animal.
6. thing: A perfect job? Is there any such animal?

HUMAN


–adjective 1. of, pertaining to, characteristic of, or having the nature of people: human frailty.
2. consisting of people: the human race.
3. of or pertaining to the social aspect of people: human affairs.
4. sympathetic; humane: a warmly human understanding

The only real thing we have in common with animals is bodily function, the genus of animals is completely different , body temperature is completely different , instinctively animals are far superior to humans far less frail and far more likely to survive in many different aspects than humans.


if we are animals we are on the bottom of the food chain.

now you may have an argument if you try for likenesses as mammals but as far as science is concerned animals and humans are completely different animals.::bigsmile::

You twit.

Here's a simple logic puzzle for you.

If all humans are primates and all primates are animals, are humans animals?

(duuuuuuhhhhh)

I did not asked for fairytale definitions read it again.

I did however leave room for you to show your colors.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#66
(12-06-2009, 10:20 PM)IMaDick Wrote: primates lack a gene that would make them human.

Humans ARE primates.

And... all 'species' of animal have relatively small genetic differences between them. That does not mean they are not all still animals.
Reply
#67
(12-06-2009, 10:24 PM)IMaDick Wrote: some animals are food animals some animals are fur,leather and hyde animals, some animals are domestic and make good pets and companions, some are work animals, and humans are the end users in most cases of all the different classes ,stop being a hypocrite about the subject.

It's HIDE not HYDE (I wouldn't bother, but that's the second time).

You are categorizing these groups of animals according to their value to humans. Other species have an intrinsic value unto themselves, which does not depend on their value to our species. However, regardless of 'value', the fact that we are capable of both causing great suffering to other species and capable of surviving without doing so, gives us a moral obligation to take the 'high road', a 'noblesse oblige' which is one of the things that does, in fact, separate us 'spiritually' from other animals.

I find it ironic that you argue to toss aside one of the few things that actually supports your argument, though it supports it in a spiritual sense, not a biological one.

The fact that most of us are hypocrites in some form or other, does not change the fact that wearing fur for vanity's sake is morally wrong.
Reply
#68
(12-06-2009, 04:56 PM)Middle Finger Wrote:
(12-06-2009, 04:47 PM)Luke Warmwater Wrote: yeah OP, don't fuck up MF's chances of having an inadequately greased sig sauer massaged in and out of his pouting asshole...
Yeah, exactly ... I think ...



Umm, Muffin..I think you may have read the post wrong, unless you really are into having a gun up your butt. ::lol::
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#69



22 Or maybe I did...Oh nos, it's gonna be one of those days.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#70
It was that "sauer" word that threw me off.
86 112
Reply
#71
Would this have made more sense?

Quote:inadequately greased sauerkraut massaged in and out of his pouting asshole
Reply
#72
Yeah, that helped. THANKS.
86 112
Reply
#73
(12-06-2009, 09:24 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: Regardless of the retard dictionary you found your info from, killing inhumanely is the issue.

No one rejected the food chain. We just think that you're a cold cunt who thinks killing and suffering mean nothing if it's not you or yours.

Ya I know definitions can be killers especially when it comes to intelligent conversation they really fuck up the touchy feely application of facts.

"we just think" should have been a clue that you are expressing opinion not fact, but hey if thats where you think the world is centered in "your opinion" then what else could be expected.

I just find it ::rotf::::rotf::::rotf::::rotf:: funny as hell !
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply
#74
(12-07-2009, 09:32 AM)IMaDick Wrote:
(12-06-2009, 09:24 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: Regardless of the retard dictionary you found your info from, killing inhumanely is the issue.

No one rejected the food chain. We just think that you're a cold cunt who thinks killing and suffering mean nothing if it's not you or yours.

Ya I know definitions can be killers especially when it comes to intelligent conversation they really fuck up the touchy feely application of facts.

"we just think" should have been a clue that you are expressing opinion not fact, but hey if thats where you think the world is centered in "your opinion" then what else could be expected.

I just find it ::rotf::::rotf::::rotf::::rotf:: funny as hell !

Wow, you're really on a retard rampage! You do realize you quoted this same thing twice now? Are you so bored this is all you can converse about? You enjoy "beating the dead horse"?

Get over your arrogant angry self and quit boring us with your drivel. You managed to turn a perfectly legitimate complaint in a thread you started into an angry rant where you think killing animals in horrible ways is OK becuase they are not human.

If you didn't spout off like a fucked up cold blooded prick, you'd have noticed everyone agreed with your original post. But hey, enjoy the spotlight of being an asshole - you deserve it most.
Reply
#75
When I trapped Beaver we always used underwater traps. And checked them 4 times a week. We sold the pelts for 25-30.00 each and having 10 to sell every month was not abnormal. Skinning them alive is just wrong.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
#76
You don't have to trap beaver now that you're married
Reply
#77
I don't understand people who have no compassion for animals being treated inhumanely, as a human being I hate to see fellow human beings and animals suffering.

I long for the day when things such as bullfighting, badger and bear baiting, cock and dog fighting and animal experiments no longer exist.

Whenever I see a person or animal suffering I get a slight dull ache in my guts, thats why I rarely watch the news anymore whether it be the family of missing a child pleading for the childs whereabouts or footage of seals being clubbed it bothers me.

If that makes me a "sissy ass fairy" then so be it, I'd rather be that than a cold hearted selfish fuck.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Reply
#78
(12-07-2009, 11:35 AM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: I don't understand people who have no compassion for animals being treated inhumanely, as a human being I hate to see fellow human beings and animals suffering.

I long for the day when things such as bullfighting, badger and bear baiting, cock and dog fighting and animal experiments no longer exist.

Whenever I see a person or animal suffering I get a slight dull ache in my guts, thats why I rarely watch the news anymore whether it be the family of missing a child pleading for the childs whereabouts or footage of seals being clubbed it bothers me.

If that makes me a "sissy ass fairy" then so be it, I'd rather be that than a cold hearted selfish fuck.

Newsflash: keeping hamsters trapped in plastic boxes is likely to be unnatural and bothersome to them.

And what makes you a "sissy ass fairy" goes beyond your views on animals.
86 112
Reply
#79
My hamsters are cared for 100% humanely they live on average twice as long as pets than they do in the wild. They have all the food, fresh water, bedding, cleaning products and toys they need to have a 100% comfortable and 100% safe life. On the rare occasion I have had a hamster escape they have always eventually returned to the location of their cage, their instinct tells them where they are better off.

Your dogs would probably prefer not to be on leads when taken out for a walk or have to wear collars, but such is life dickhead.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Reply
#80
(12-07-2009, 11:45 AM)Middle Finger Wrote:
(12-07-2009, 11:35 AM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: I don't understand people who have no compassion for animals being treated inhumanely, as a human being I hate to see fellow human beings and animals suffering.

I long for the day when things such as bullfighting, badger and bear baiting, cock and dog fighting and animal experiments no longer exist.

Whenever I see a person or animal suffering I get a slight dull ache in my guts, thats why I rarely watch the news anymore whether it be the family of missing a child pleading for the childs whereabouts or footage of seals being clubbed it bothers me.

If that makes me a "sissy ass fairy" then so be it, I'd rather be that than a cold hearted selfish fuck.

Newsflash: keeping hamsters trapped in plastic boxes is likely to be unnatural and bothersome to them.


I'm sure the weirdo has a little mansion set up for them complete with mini roller coasters and shit.
Reply