Mock - Porn free! in the UK

David Cameron has today announced that online pornography will automatically be blocked by internet service providers in the UK. Those wishing to access porn will have to declare they wish to do so before they can access it.

Also porn depicting scenes of rape or simulated rape is to be made illiegal in England and Wales, a law already in place in Scotland.

Cameron said he made the decision because easy access to online pornography was “corroding childhoods”.

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076

Wow. That's kinda heavy handed, isn't it? I don't have a problem with adults looking at "normal" porn and it's up to those same adults to monitor their children when they are online, I don't think one's government should be babysitting in this fashion.

Agreed Duchess.

I guess England isn't the land of the free.

Problem - reaction - solution.

The scum that murdered April Jones and the other scum that murdered Tia Sharp both progressed from legal porn to child porn to murder.

Plus there was a recent report saying kids in the UK were being sexualized younger because of access to online porn.

If people want porn or paedophiles want child porn they'll get it somewhere or other.

Duchess, What is "normal" porn?

(07-22-2013, 10:20 AM)ramseycat Wrote: [ -> ]I guess England isn't the land of the free.

Neither is America.

Prism is watching you right now!

I'm sure they are CN. too bad they will just be bored by my antics here on FB.

I do agree the kids do have easy access to porn. And they always find a way around the parental blocks.

(07-22-2013, 10:22 AM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: [ -> ]Duchess, What is "normal" porn?

Anything without MS, bacon and Beverly Hillbilly reruns.

(07-22-2013, 10:22 AM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: [ -> ]Duchess, What is "normal" porn?

Porn that doesn't involve children or animals. You really didn't know how that would be classified?

(07-22-2013, 01:05 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Porn that doesn't involve children or animals.

Or octomom.

Ewwwwww!

I see "normal' as subjective and each person would have their own definition based on their experience and comfort zone. Since your definition protects the beasts and the children, as would mine, can I assume B&D, fetish, group sex, gay sex, scat, and other acts between consenting adults fall within those acceptable boundaries? (of course that would exclude anything MS would appear in......... or watch for that matter)

(07-22-2013, 02:00 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: [ -> ]can I assume B&D, fetish, group sex, gay sex, scat, and other acts between consenting adults fall within those acceptable boundaries?

Yes

I didn't get the “rape” porn thing.

Who the hell wants to watch someone get raped or pretend to get raped?

Although esad would probably get off on it.

(07-22-2013, 02:22 PM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: [ -> ]Who the hell wants to watch someone get raped or pretend to get raped?

Clang comes to mind.

(07-22-2013, 01:01 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: [ -> ]Anything without MS, bacon and Beverly Hillbilly reruns.

Happy Birthday MS

(07-22-2013, 01:54 PM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: [ -> ]
(07-22-2013, 01:05 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Porn that doesn't involve children or animals.

Or octomom.

Ewwwwww!

(07-22-2013, 02:32 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: [ -> ]Clang comes to mind.

He might to have to resort to rape to lose his cherry.

I really hope it doesn't come to that.

I hope he's seen and absorbed that Kelly McGillis public information film.

Looks like someone been poking her with a 10 foot pole

I hate when there is a zit on my back and I cannot reach it.

(07-22-2013, 04:25 PM)SIXFOOTERsez Wrote: [ -> ]Looks like someone been poking her with a 10 foot pole

Its the only thing I would touch the birthing sow with.

Ewwwww.