Mock

I guess the old adage stands: I brought you into this world and I can take you out!

There are laws in this universe greater than Man's laws. She will pay for what she did. It won't even the account, but she will pay for what she did. You have to give stuff up to the universe sometimes or you would hold ugliness inside you. Be nicer to the kids in your life until the disappointment leaves you. Make some good from the bad. Boycott Orlando, though. Fuckers.

I am just so angry. It makes me sick that it only took them 10 hours to come to a verdict. How much did they put into it? "Well if we say not guilty, we get to go home. If we say guilty, we may have to stick around longer"???? I am sick. I hate to say it but it makes me lose a lot of faith in our justice system!

The jury didn't deliberate that long in my opinion. I think after 33 days they wanted the fuck outta there and made a snap decision. I am sure they will not be very popular when they return to their lives.

(07-05-2011, 03:22 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-05-2011, 03:19 PM)Cracker Wrote: [ -> ]Do it Duchess: Honk, honk!

You were right when you said you had to work your brain on vacation. Have you been slacking?

Yup. Ending soon, though.

I remember reading that you sometimes do the "blow your horn" motion.

(07-05-2011, 03:22 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: [ -> ]Do you have that graphic in a 90's Pontiac Sunfire?

No, sorry, they only sold those in Arizona and Florida. Some old people were fooled into buying them to regain their mojo.

Will this work?

(07-05-2011, 03:28 PM)Cracker Wrote: [ -> ]I remember reading that you sometimes do the "blow your horn" motion.

I do & it's fun. I like to make the driver smile. Would he be the honker & I'm the honkee. Hahahaha! That just popped into my head. *face palm*

I thought you were implying I should post the graphic on facebook.

Well, I guess that juror gets to go on that cruise that sets sail on the 7^th!!!

(07-05-2011, 03:31 PM)Cracker Wrote: [ -> ]Will this work?

I needed that!

And twenty more of those cards . . . just in case.

I didn't really follow the trial because it seems like the little girls death was turned into a big circus and form of entertainment for everyone, but from the little I did see it didn't look like they had much evidence to convict her of murder. How do you convict someone of murder when you have no solid proof of who did it or how it happened?

Some folks believe that the justice system is for the victim, but it has been my experiance that the one charged with the crime is the one on trial and the laws are there to make sure that justice serves the accused.

it might be well for a few of you to know this, it might be well if a few of you understand the state failed in their case.

They didn't prove murder or make the connection to casey.


Don't let my words above cause you to think that I think she was innocent because I think she is guilty, the problem was never in her guilt but in being able to prove it.

back to her imaginary job and imaginary friends and imaginary life.
who will hire her? who will love, trust or screw her? who will trust her with their checkbooks or credit cards? i hope her life is exactly what she deserves.

and i agree that the Universe will give her justice.

One has to remember, that for the last 3 years the media whores like NG, JVM, VP & others have put their own bias spin on the facts & painted a guilty picture of Casey over & over again. Pointing out all Casey's faults therefore causing the mass general public opinion that Casey was positively guilty of murder & only murder.

However, the supposed untainted "jury" was only shown the evidence presented by the State & defense. (none of the bias media shit) And much of that evidence considered bias, we saw, was argued about between the opposing attorneys when the jury was out of the room. Then only the agreed upon evidence was finally shown to the jury. Therefore, from the evidence, and only that evidence presented to the jury, it seems the state did not prove it's "murder one, two, or three case" beyond a reasonable doubt.


It would be wise for that jury to remain anonymous for their own safety! General public tempers are at volcano hot!



The question still unanswered, "how did Caylee die? Only Casey & "her maker" really know.

(07-05-2011, 03:37 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Don't let my words above cause you to think that I think she was innocent because I think she is guilty, the problem was never in her guilt but in being able to prove it.

I agree. I think she's guilty without a doubt, but they didn't have any solid proof from what I saw.

(07-05-2011, 03:42 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]However, the supposed untainted "jury" was only shown the evidence presented by the State & defense.

So . . .

Who presented evidence stating Casey was not the last person to have custody of Caylee - defense or prosecution?

Duchess if you ever have to stand trial, make note of the sweaters and shirts tied behind your back to show your boobs prominently, it seems to have worked this time.

If you want to find out if it would work for you, just start a thread with a few pics and I would be glad to give you the benefit of my opinion.

who killed you little girl? who put duct tape over your face and threw you in a palmetto swamp to be devoured by wildlife? who had such disregard and contempt for your right to a life?

they were first to get up and leave. i wonder what is in their heart of hearts. look at their expressions. they know. they will reap the whirlwind.

(07-05-2011, 03:46 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-05-2011, 03:42 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]However, the supposed untainted "jury" was only shown the evidence presented by the State & defense.

So . . .

Who presented evidence stating Casey was not the last person to have custody of Caylee - defense or prosecution?

Casey was the last person to have Caylee, Caylee died, how is the question? Casey is definately guilty of child neglect, Caylee died in her care, of lack thereof.

The child neglect should have been at least charged if ANYTHING, she did not report her CHILD MISSING for 31 DAYS!!

They should keep them in protective custody for a while. And I forgot all about this juror who had a vaca coming up July 7^th. SICK PEOPLE IF THAT IS WHAT THEY WERE DOING!!

(07-05-2011, 04:00 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]Casey was the last person to have Caylee, Caylee died, how is the question? Casey is definately guilty of child neglect, Caylee died in her care, of lack thereof.

My point.

And the jury knew and heard testimony to that, too.

But she wasn't convicted of child neglect.