(02-14-2010, 05:55 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: Because Paranoid Frank suggested that in Cracker's thread somewhere is why I mentioned that.

So what does that have to do with me ?...I'm not paranoid.

It was his suggestion to make it a rule. You're the admin, you'd be reading PM's for violations. Just more work he thinks you need. At least that was his implication.

Ant, you misunderstood. I did not mean for Duchess to read PMs just cause she can or just to make sure, etc. I would never suggest that. I was referring to people reporting PMs and them coming to her attention. Just like people have reported rule-breaking PMs to me on my sites in the past. I had to take action when someone was harassing, spamming, etc. through PMs. Ant, you assume A LOT when we argue and it almost always results in your error and embarrassment.

So yes, I believe the standard should be that PMs are not be conduits of disseminating personal info rule-breaking material. How well that can be enforced or if that standard should be put in place is not my decision. It was just my opinion, bitch-frog.

(02-14-2010, 05:58 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(02-14-2010, 05:55 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: Because Paranoid Frank suggested that in Cracker's thread somewhere is why I mentioned that.

So what does that have to do with me ?...I'm not paranoid.

Ant has a hard time differentiating between someone being paranoid and someone feeling that a certain standard would be best for their favorite site, for the long-term. She is more concerned about her short-term emotional needs, Lumpy, etc. while I am more concerned about protecting you, the site, and it staying a cool place for the long-term. Totally frowning upon this personal private info shit can only be good for the site, but bad for the assholes. That is why Ant is all worked up. She is an asshole defending other assholes. It's really that simple, and sad.

(02-14-2010, 06:00 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: It was his suggestion to make it a rule. You're the admin, you'd be reading PM's for violations. Just more work he thinks you need. At least that was his implication.

You're an Admin., do you take orders from your members ?...Would you take kindly to your members saying you did ?...How would you like it if the preception was that a dude was controlling your every move...Hmmm ?...I am not incompetent, I'm capable of making decisions, good or bad, I take responsibility for them...I'll do what I can & learn as I go, sometimes by trial & error...If there is something I can't do and it needs to be done, I will pay to have it done by someone who does know what they are doing...Give me a fuckin' break here.

(02-14-2010, 05:45 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: I think if everyone who's had "private info" posted or PM's exposed had simply denied or ignored the info (pm's) none of this completely insane paranoia and discussion about privacy would be going on right now.

I know the post that got Lumpy banned but I never followed the link. I just didn't care enough about it but I can tell you I did post about that fucked up clown designer JB posted there and pleny of others, including Duchess posted in that thread without obviously bothering to look at the link that was "offensive".

If that was Frank's real info, all he had to do was deny it was him. His name is common. If he bitched that it was a location, I call bullshit because ALL of us have mentioned our location in the past on this board.

But Frank got his sack in a twist for the sole reason it was Lumpy who did it twice to him. Yeah, go ahead and turn this post into a defense of Lumpy when in reality it's nothing of the kind. Do you think just MAYBE if you lightened up or took a periodic break from your insane ragging on her, trying to control newbies to "hate" her that she may have reciprocated in kind? Go on and say she started first. I dare you, because I can dig up just as much from you to equalize that shit. The last 6 months you showed a distateful side of Frank that was NOT "in the spirit of the site".

If Julie only laughed at Cracker instead of feeding it, that too would not go on for over 20 pages. If Julie didn't say a word about her "exposed" pm none of the animosity between her and Lumpy would exist. Julie posted that shit openly before any pm's were exchanged. I've said as much when that was going on too but Julie couldn't help herself and morphed it into racism long before Duchess "offended" her with a word.

It's a mock forum. EVERYONE here has been guilty of mocking income, children, location, social status, someone's job and more. All of a sudden because of the real life hatred Frank has toward one member, this shit got way out of control and paranoia seems to be the mood of the day. Change those rules and its' not Mock anymore.

Go on Frank, tell Duchess how to access those PM's now in the admn panel so personal info is kept PRIVATE. Tell her how you think this and that should be changed to suit your needs. NO ONE has made such a stink over this until it was done to you - all it needed to be was denied. No one would have known the difference.

I think the researching assholes and the N-word evokers are at fault. So, there you have it. Everyonee's thoughts have been shared & now it's up to Duchess.

(02-14-2010, 06:31 PM)Julie Wrote: the N-word evokers are at fault.

It's all my fault.

Hey, MF...betcha I came full circle way faster than you did...

Yours and the researchers who seem to be receiving leeway galore and major mega hand holding in order to retain their forum membership. But who's counting

At fault for what? I'm a little dense, but I don't see the big deal. Some can dish it out and not take it, besides that, where is the crime?

Again, I can see the problem with a last name being posted, but the two who fucking whine about it are the only two who use their real first names. Is that maybe a bad decision?

(02-14-2010, 06:45 PM)Julie Wrote: Yours and the researchers who seem to be receiving leeway galore and major mega hand holding in order to retain their forum membership. But who's counting

I resent that. I am a QUALITY researcher. Mad skillz.

Hey Duch, would I get banned if I called another member a nigger?

(02-14-2010, 06:50 PM)ramseycat Wrote: Hey Duch, would I get banned if I called another member a nigger?

Jesus Christ, Ramsey...

[/b]I think the researching assholes and the N-word evokers are at fault. So, there you have it. Everyonee's thoughts have been shared & now it's up to Duchess.


[b]So here we have yet another bitch that can't aknowlege that she had a huge fucking part in all this soap opera bullshit.
No surprise there.
And Duchess has already said what she has to say. STFU up about it or be gone.

P.S. Stop with the n-word crap. The word is Nigger....Like everyone is too fucking stupid or poor to figure out what you mean.

I don't like that word. Why use it when there are so many other, nicer words: picaninny, jigaboo, coon, etc.

(02-14-2010, 06:52 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(02-14-2010, 06:50 PM)ramseycat Wrote: Hey Duch, would I get banned if I called another member a nigger?

Jesus Christ, Ramsey...

(02-14-2010, 06:47 PM)Cracker Wrote: At fault for what? I'm a little dense, but I don't see the big deal. Some can dish it out and not take it, besides that, where is the crime?

::lol::

(02-14-2010, 06:50 PM)ramseycat Wrote: Hey Duch, would I get banned if I called another member a nigger?

Good question. Try it & see!

(02-14-2010, 06:57 PM)Julie Wrote:

(02-14-2010, 06:47 PM)Cracker Wrote: At fault for what? I'm a little dense, but I don't see the big deal. Some can dish it out and not take it, besides that, where is the crime?

::lol::

STOP.

I did.

::lol::

And I stand by my statement: I would LOVE to answer questions about why I was so offended. Go for it.