I've been up to my ass in internet issues with COMCAST!!!! Still don't know what the problem is, but I'm online now... well, for the time being, anyway,

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

Being that "some of the recent contributors here were right", you must know some names. So who is it?

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

Shit.

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

Thanks for sharing DC if you aren't comfortable going into detail, could you give a hint as to which theory was right on the mark? There's been so many.

(02-24-2011, 08:58 AM)fabulous Wrote: I think that I"ve already posted on here that my job has me inneracting with LE quite frequently...and I heard from one of them that there was a very bloody crime scene and that the house didn't look "ransacked" per se, but that it looked like there had been a struggle not only in the kitchen/dining room/living room area, but other parts of the house as well.

I"m wondering if the "other parts as well" statement from my friend is meant to read: in the master bedroom.

interesting! maybe so? ... maybe you can tie this person down, as to what they actually meant? .... thanks for the bit of info!

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

If she was tortured, then IMO, it was done for Johnny's benefit... how sad

(02-24-2011, 02:50 PM)toledoarea Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

Being that "some of the recent contributors here were right", you must know some names. So who is it?

yes, please ???? Can you send me this info in pm ?? IF not, I'll certainly understand.

(02-24-2011, 02:56 PM)Jane Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

If she was tortured, then IMO, it was done for Johnny's benefit... how sad

Which could be
1. to get info out of him
2. anger at her for rejecting someone
3. sending a message to ?
and???

(02-24-2011, 10:03 AM)Freshbait78 Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 09:49 AM)trixie Wrote:

(02-23-2011, 11:58 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote: BTW I highly doubt I'll make it. I'd have to take my child & I'm not down with that.

I have to take 3, but hey, I want some Crispy Green Bean Fries!

LOL nooo I'm not opposed to taking my kid to a restaurant or benefit I was talking about meeting internet strangers with child intow.

On a side note, I didn't mean to coerce anyone into posting their pictures in members only. It was actually a semi joke, hence the mention of the bad internet dating. Then again, I didn't see the point of PM people with a secret series of winks or hand gestures. If you're planning on meeting anyway, you might as well make it easy & share a picture. That was my thought process. Sorry to anyone who took it the wrong way.

I wouldn't take my children to a benefit of this kind either! (course mine are grown, & I don't live anywhere near Toledo)

(02-24-2011, 09:31 AM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 02:17 AM)ToledoNative Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 01:58 AM)imsuchawildflower Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 01:39 AM)TotallyCurious Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 01:29 AM)stoof725 Wrote: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profi...0773739904

Thanks. Wow.

I know this is disrespectful....but I have to ask it....does
Maytee shave off her eyebrows and then draw new ones on?
Is this a common practice?

Its a very common thing where he in NM. Its very very *latina* or *hispanic*. Straight (not bangin) girls call it Chola, meaning like a gang girl. The first time I saw it in my life was when I lived in Florida and the Cuban and Puerto Rican girls did it. I next saw it in California, and now in NM. White girls who are *down* will do it to.
But to answer your question, its VERY common in hispanic women and even more common among girls (white or hispanic) that run with gangs.

And here you see a great example of the 'gang mentality'..."Maybe if I draw different eyebrows on, they won't know it was me that did the drive by!"

LOL< they look like DRIVE BY EYEBROWS, like somebody drew them on as they were driving by!!

(02-24-2011, 02:57 PM)Jane Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 02:50 PM)toledoarea Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 02:46 PM)DCTim Wrote: I learned from a VERY reliable source today that LE knows who the perps were. Suffice to say that some of the recent contributors here were right on the mark.

I think what they're waiting for is DNA evidence to be returned before any arrests are made.

Sadly, what we have heard about LS being tortured is evidently correct. Worse than we've read here I'm told.

Being that "some of the recent contributors here were right", you must know some names. So who is it?

yes, please ???? Can you send me this info in pm ?? IF not, I'll certainly understand.

That poor girl. I feel worse now than before. can you also pm me if comfortable.

RIP Lisa and Johnny.

(02-24-2011, 03:04 PM)Jane Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 10:03 AM)Freshbait78 Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 09:49 AM)trixie Wrote:

(02-23-2011, 11:58 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote: BTW I highly doubt I'll make it. I'd have to take my child & I'm not down with that.

I have to take 3, but hey, I want some Crispy Green Bean Fries!

LOL nooo I'm not opposed to taking my kid to a restaurant or benefit I was talking about meeting internet strangers with child intow.

On a side note, I didn't mean to coerce anyone into posting their pictures in members only. It was actually a semi joke, hence the mention of the bad internet dating. Then again, I didn't see the point of PM people with a secret series of winks or hand gestures. If you're planning on meeting anyway, you might as well make it easy & share a picture. That was my thought process. Sorry to anyone who took it the wrong way.

I wouldn't take my children to a benefit of this kind either! (course mine are grown, & I don't live anywhere near Toledo)

It's not the benefit I have a problem with. I don't think there will be a reinactment or anything. I would never agree to meet someone who was a stranger to me, with my child, public place or not.

(02-24-2011, 11:05 AM)toledoarea Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 10:58 AM)fabulous Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 10:19 AM)toledoarea Wrote: correct me if I'm wrong, but I think she said about ten min. in the 911 call. and the last I heard maytee lived on danbury st. in south toledo. Pretty much a straight shot down airport hwy with lots of traffic lights. of course no traffic at 11-3 in the morning. Then again i could be wrong because danbury st. is all houses and somebody mentioned that she lived in a trailer

if you go to the audtitors website for Lucas county ohio is reports that Maytee OWNS a trailer, she may not be living there though. I read in some court document that she was LIVING in a house on Danberry st. the house on Danberry st. is owned by another individual with the same last name of Vasquez.

Nice find, however make sure you're looking for the right danbury. I could be wrong but I think it's danbury and not danberry. again, I could be mistaken

It's Danberry. It's off Airport just down from S. Detroit.

Posted on TCR in comments; see c.

http://lcapps.co.lucas.oh.us/ftproot/nor...ummary.pdf

since we have a number of new people, time for me to repost: crime forum rules

http://mockforums.net/thread-4781.html

I realize we're all very interested in this case and are starved for information. However, I'm reluctant to be any more specific out of fear of compromising the investigation.

Mostly I felt compelled to share with other Mockers that things ARE proceeding and that LE has not let this case go cold. I know it's easy to jump to that conclusion when there's an absence of information from LE; I was getting frustrated myself.

(02-24-2011, 03:13 PM)esbee Wrote: Posted on TC in comments; see c

http://lcapps.co.lucas.oh.us/ftproot/nor...ummary.pdf

how is he connected to murders?

(02-24-2011, 03:04 PM)Jane Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 10:03 AM)Freshbait78 Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 09:49 AM)trixie Wrote:

(02-23-2011, 11:58 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote: BTW I highly doubt I'll make it. I'd have to take my child & I'm not down with that.

I have to take 3, but hey, I want some Crispy Green Bean Fries!

LOL nooo I'm not opposed to taking my kid to a restaurant or benefit I was talking about meeting internet strangers with child intow.

On a side note, I didn't mean to coerce anyone into posting their pictures in members only. It was actually a semi joke, hence the mention of the bad internet dating. Then again, I didn't see the point of PM people with a secret series of winks or hand gestures. If you're planning on meeting anyway, you might as well make it easy & share a picture. That was my thought process. Sorry to anyone who took it the wrong way.

I wouldn't take my children to a benefit of this kind either! (course mine are grown, & I don't live anywhere near Toledo)

I think when they say benefit they mean whatever they make today will go to the reward fund. The restaurant is still open for normal business.

(02-24-2011, 03:14 PM)DCTim Wrote: I realize we're all very interested in this case and are starved for information. However, I'm reluctant to be any more specific out of fear of compromising the investigation.

Mostly I felt compelled to share with other Mockers that things ARE proceeding and that LE has not let this case go cold. I know it's easy to jump to that conclusion when there's an absence of information from LE; I was getting frustrated myself.

Thank you!!

(02-24-2011, 03:12 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 03:04 PM)Jane Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 10:03 AM)Freshbait78 Wrote:

(02-24-2011, 09:49 AM)trixie Wrote:

(02-23-2011, 11:58 PM)Freshbait78 Wrote: BTW I highly doubt I'll make it. I'd have to take my child & I'm not down with that.

I have to take 3, but hey, I want some Crispy Green Bean Fries!

LOL nooo I'm not opposed to taking my kid to a restaurant or benefit I was talking about meeting internet strangers with child intow.

On a side note, I didn't mean to coerce anyone into posting their pictures in members only. It was actually a semi joke, hence the mention of the bad internet dating. Then again, I didn't see the point of PM people with a secret series of winks or hand gestures. If you're planning on meeting anyway, you might as well make it easy & share a picture. That was my thought process. Sorry to anyone who took it the wrong way.

I wouldn't take my children to a benefit of this kind either! (course mine are grown, & I don't live anywhere near Toledo)

It's not the benefit I have a problem with. I don't think there will be a reinactment or anything. I would never agree to meet someone who was a stranger to me, with my child, public place or not.

I agree with this also! Either way, I wouldn't take my children to anything that was even remotely tied to a murder..

(02-24-2011, 02:31 PM)Red_velvet71 Wrote: LOL< they look like DRIVE BY EYEBROWS, like somebody drew them on as they were driving by!!

Could be worse.






Holy Fuck! OMG! Hahahaha! She did that to herself deliberately!