(03-06-2011, 01:52 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote: The older pictures (only about 7 months old if the camera is right) on the beach he and Lisa look much healthier and he looks physically bigger than in that BA Christmas picture the one where he is wearing the green shirt (BA has the whole picture posted on FB) they both look like they loss a lot of weight to me anyway.

Edit: My bad it looks to be only 5 months.

I added the whole picture to our Link Page
Click on the picture to enlarge

http://mockforums.net/post-141600.html#pid141600

(03-06-2011, 02:02 PM)ToledoNative Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:00 PM)Miss Conspiracy Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 01:52 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote: The older pictures (only about 7 months old if the camera is right) on the beach he and Lisa look much healthier and he looks physically bigger than in that BA Christmas picture the one where he is wearing the green shirt (BA has the whole picture posted on FB) they both look like they loss a lot of weight to me anyway.
Edit: My bad it looks to be only 5 months.

yeah I have to agree. they both look much thinner in the December pics. Lisa almost looks like a different person. I hate to speculate and say it's drugs, but that's a big change in a short time

Those pics are from July 2010. They were in Miami.

He doesn't look quite as "beefed" up like he does in some of the other pictures with his shirt's off. I"m guessing that he wasn't working out as much and other things, and Lisa look a lot less healthier to me too, and way thinner.

(03-06-2011, 02:10 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:02 PM)ToledoNative Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:00 PM)Miss Conspiracy Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 01:52 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote: The older pictures (only about 7 months old if the camera is right) on the beach he and Lisa look much healthier and he looks physically bigger than in that BA Christmas picture the one where he is wearing the green shirt (BA has the whole picture posted on FB) they both look like they loss a lot of weight to me anyway.
Edit: My bad it looks to be only 5 months.

yeah I have to agree. they both look much thinner in the December pics. Lisa almost looks like a different person. I hate to speculate and say it's drugs, but that's a big change in a short time

Those pics are from July 2010. They were in Miami.

He doesn't look quite as "beefed" up like he does in some of the other pictures with his shirt's off. I"m guessing that he wasn't working out as much and other things, and Lisa look a lot less healthier to me too, and way thinner.

He got all rocked up when he was in the slammer. These pics were taken two years after he got out.

(03-06-2011, 02:10 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:02 PM)ToledoNative Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:00 PM)Miss Conspiracy Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 01:52 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote: The older pictures (only about 7 months old if the camera is right) on the beach he and Lisa look much healthier and he looks physically bigger than in that BA Christmas picture the one where he is wearing the green shirt (BA has the whole picture posted on FB) they both look like they loss a lot of weight to me anyway.
Edit: My bad it looks to be only 5 months.

yeah I have to agree. they both look much thinner in the December pics. Lisa almost looks like a different person. I hate to speculate and say it's drugs, but that's a big change in a short time

Those pics are from July 2010. They were in Miami.

He doesn't look quite as "beefed" up like he does in some of the other pictures with his shirt's off. I"m guessing that he wasn't working out as much and other things, and Lisa look a lot less healthier to me too, and way thinner.

What is that he is holding a energy drink? Can't make out the name on it.

Sorry but impo there's no way in God's green earth are you going to find TW and crew nor Mytee for that matter making any kind of public statement at this juncture of the investigation. To put it simply, all of the above either have no idea who the perps are or if they do, certainly aren't going to go on public TV knowing what the end result could bring.

Also, going back to the posts with regards to neck wounds on the victims, let's not forget that neither the final autopsy reports OR toxicology reports have been made public. So as far as being able to subdue JC, one would have to assume there was either a gun involved or he was drugged, and that would apply to someone even half is weight.

i doubt 48 Hours or any other true crime program would cover it until there is a resolution. they like to show the outcome of cases.

(03-06-2011, 02:22 PM)browntabby1226 Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:10 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:02 PM)ToledoNative Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:00 PM)Miss Conspiracy Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 01:52 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote: The older pictures (only about 7 months old if the camera is right) on the beach he and Lisa look much healthier and he looks physically bigger than in that BA Christmas picture the one where he is wearing the green shirt (BA has the whole picture posted on FB) they both look like they loss a lot of weight to me anyway.
Edit: My bad it looks to be only 5 months.

yeah I have to agree. they both look much thinner in the December pics. Lisa almost looks like a different person. I hate to speculate and say it's drugs, but that's a big change in a short time

Those pics are from July 2010. They were in Miami.

He doesn't look quite as "beefed" up like he does in some of the other pictures with his shirt's off. I"m guessing that he wasn't working out as much and other things, and Lisa look a lot less healthier to me too, and way thinner.

What is that he is holding a energy drink? Can't make out the name on it.

It's a liquor Sparkling Nuvo...

(03-06-2011, 02:26 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i doubt 48 Hours or any other true crime program would cover it until there is a resolution. they like to show the outcome of cases.

I do think they will do it. If they find out how much it is being talked about online. Also, the type of crime it is. I watch 48 hours, Dateline, and ²⁰⁄₂₀ constantly. If I can find it on a channel I watch it. I love ID (Investigation Discovery) and TLC will show them too. I just saw one last night that was an unresolved case of a missing man who disappeared when picking up his child from his ex. It was still being investigated. They couldn't get any info from LE but brought in their own PIs to do the work. I've seen it more and more lately.

Also, Maytee seems just fine with talking to media. She has done so already. She wants justice and I don't think being scared will stop her.

(03-06-2011, 02:26 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i doubt 48 Hours or any other true crime program would cover it until there is a resolution. they like to show the outcome of cases.

Unsolved Mysteries, perhaps

i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)curious Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:26 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i doubt 48 Hours or any other true crime program would cover it until there is a resolution. they like to show the outcome of cases.

Unsolved Mysteries, perhaps

What network is Unsolved Mysteries on? I thought the Unsolved Mysteries guy died. I could never watch it when he was on it. His voice just creeped me out. He could have done voice overs in horror movies.

(03-06-2011, 02:43 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:22 PM)browntabby1226 Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:10 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:02 PM)ToledoNative Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:00 PM)Miss Conspiracy Wrote: yeah I have to agree. they both look much thinner in the December pics. Lisa almost looks like a different person. I hate to speculate and say it's drugs, but that's a big change in a short time

Those pics are from July 2010. They were in Miami.

He doesn't look quite as "beefed" up like he does in some of the other pictures with his shirt's off. I"m guessing that he wasn't working out as much and other things, and Lisa look a lot less healthier to me too, and way thinner.

What is that he is holding a energy drink? Can't make out the name on it.

It's a liquor Sparkling Nuvo...

A French Sparkling Vodka (NUVO) about $30.00 a bottle and they have a web site.

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

I watch a lot, lol, 48hrs, Snapped, Body of Evidence w/ Dayle Hinman (she's good) and many more....

(03-06-2011, 12:40 PM)Methusala Wrote: While you took a hot bath, I had a nice hot shower.
And a good thing, too.
Because it looks like we are going to have to agree to disagree.

I am amazed by this malarkey now in vogue, about us living under myriad laws which have to be reversed because they violate the Constitution.

Just because some people dress up and run around wearing colonial clothing doesn't mean they know anything about how the Constitution has been interpreted and applied over the years to test each and every law which has been passed.

Since Marbury v. Madison, it has been held that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of whether or not laws which have been passed are in conflict with the Constitution, and they have done their job. That's what they do. People have been taking their complaints to the Supreme Court, about whether or not laws are Constitutional ever since. In addition, if you think a law violates your rights under the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, and cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you, as ruled in the Gideon case.

Just because some unemployed plumber here in Toledo yells "Socialist" after reading one book he found in his attic doesn't mean that he knows what he's talking about. Along with individual freedoms, the constitutional expressly states that it was written to, among other things, provide for the common welfare. These people in their pseudo-colonial uniforms are like a group of Rip Van Winkles who seemingly have just woken up, missed reading about all the cases taken to the Supreme Court over hundreds of years, which have tested and determined which laws are constitutional and which are not, and are running around yelling "Save the Constitution" like a bunch of ninnies, IMHO.

They are the "sheeple" to which you have alluded elsewhere.

We have good laws and we have bad laws, but we don't have unconstitutional laws. This is a myth.

Nevertheless, I respect their right to think otherwise. They are free to take all these cases back to the Supreme Court all over again. Let them.

As for the laws which now require people who seek the help of the courts to provide evidence (DNA) in support of their paternity cases, there is nothing new in the concept that states and courts can require parties to prove their cases, based upon the current state of scientific knowledge. There is a case for that too:

"Just when a scientific principle or discovery crosses the line between the experimental and demonstrable stages is difficult to define. Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs." Frye v. United States."

By the way, I don't mean to imply that you, ShitStorm, are one of those unthinking ninnies. It is obvious that you have done a lot of thinking about this subject and I admire the extent of your reasoning and argument. I just think that you are making a mistake buying into the notion advanced by that group.

I will have to stand on the side of shit

A. In marbury v. madison the sup court gave themselves the power to be the final review and if memory serves (its been many years since I read the case...the whole fucking case) they made themselves the final review of State law! State law! States have their own supreme courts to deal with it, but no! The feds can do it better. In the consititution the three branches of govt are plainly explained and their powers are listed. these powers are not vague, they are plain black and white. Read the section covering the powers of the supreme court. Again I haven't looked in a long time, but the sup court covers cases between states, maritime case etc. They aren't the supreme judges of the country. just a court to deal with the cases that either state courts would have a bias and conflict if they adjudicated the case or cases that would never fall in the jurisdiction of one of the states. Note also that the congress can pass law on only a very narrow set of issues including interstate commerce or health and welfare (talk about vague). If you review most fed laws it will have what is called a jurisditional hook. a jursidicitional hook includes the interestate commerce or health and welfare language in an effort to 1. make it consititutional, and 2. broaden their powers.

Second a lawyer is only appointed in criminal cases, that involve a penalty of prison and only from the point of arraignment on to conviction (and you get one appeal for free). This doesn't include civil. when the aclu brings cases to challenge the constitutionality of a law it is through civil court. ONly when it defends a person for a crime that is unconsitutional do they get that free attorney.

Frye v. us was regarding polygraphs which are not allowed as evidence at trial.

Last: of course there are unconstitutional laws. Jim crow laws were held unconsititutional. criminal laws regarding inter-racial marriage. unconstitutional. Brown v. board ring a bell. state v. lopez (fed law for gun-free school zones) held unconstitutional (b4 you shit, the court said that making such a law falls to the states, not the federal govt. to get their nose into state schools and state criminal codes etc.) Those are the ones that jump out at me. There are others.

The point is our society only elects people to represent us in maintaining our society. They only hold the power that we give them, nothing more. When they go beyond that power it is up to that same society to reel them back in (usually through the civil court {where you have to hire and attorney, or get the aclu to take the case}). If the elected officials cant be reeled back in, and they continue to fail to maintain the society the individuals are then left to survive any way they can. why, because there is no more society. or to put another way society (through it's elected agents) breached the social contract with the individuals in that society.

(03-06-2011, 02:56 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

I watch a lot, lol, 48hrs, Snapped, Body of Evidence w/ Dayle Hinman (she's good) and many more....

I like First 48!!

(03-06-2011, 02:58 PM)JsMom Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:56 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

I watch a lot, lol, 48hrs, Snapped, Body of Evidence w/ Dayle Hinman (she's good) and many more....

I like First 48!!

Main Street Mysteries is also pretty good on ID
I don't like the Dominick Dunne show he always talks about cases involving rich people. Discovery Health also used to have some true crime shows on it like reruns of ²⁰⁄₂₀ etc but when Oprah bought it she ruined it.

(03-06-2011, 02:58 PM)JsMom Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:56 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

I watch a lot, lol, 48hrs, Snapped, Body of Evidence w/ Dayle Hinman (she's good) and many more....

I like First 48!!

Me too, that's what has me worried that this is taking so long and the only mention of anything has to be dug up, and really hat's off for finding that, in some obscure monthly report?? I can't see why the local newspapers and TV news aren't saying anything, not even, a no comment from the Sheriff, the locals say there's nothing, What the fuck, at least fucking ask, okay! Report something even it's nothing, you know what I mean, keep it alive!

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

A case that haunts me to this day is the Beverly Mc Gowan case and how resourceful, Elaine Parent, her killer was.

Hey we're neighbors. I'm just across the hill in NC.
[/quote]

Awesome! Howdy neighbor!
[/quote]

In the words of the immortal Minnie Pearl, "How-deeeeeeeee!"

(03-06-2011, 03:05 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:58 PM)JsMom Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:56 PM)EastCoastKat Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 02:49 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i hope so too. i like Dateline also.

they covered a couple cases i was involved with in florida.

I watch a lot, lol, 48hrs, Snapped, Body of Evidence w/ Dayle Hinman (she's good) and many more....

I like First 48!!

Me too, that's what has me worried that this is taking so long and the only mention of anything has to be dug up, and really hat's off for finding that, in some obscure monthly report?? I can't see why the local newspapers and TV news aren't saying anything, not even, a no comment from the Sheriff, the locals say there's nothing, What the fuck, at least fucking ask, okay! Report something even it's nothing, you know what I mean, keep it alive!

Your Damn Right! Its like they give up anymore! UGH! KEEP THIS CASE ALIVE! We all might be lookin like this :wheelchair: by the time its all over with! The more we bug the more its going to stay alive!