Didn't read it. You are a foreigner. Cracker disqualifies you from any further discussion of American issues.

(03-06-2011, 01:57 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Yep, He has increased afghanistan rather than diminish our presence there, He had a choice and He said afghanistan is where we should be fighting and at that moment afghanistan became his.

Why the hell did he think we could fight these assholes there, Russia couldn't do it?

But wouldn't capturing or killing Osama bin Laden be a big, fat feather in Barack's cap?

(03-06-2011, 06:53 PM)username Wrote: But wouldn't capturing or killing Osama bin Laden be a big, fat feather in Barack's cap?

No. He only golfs on military bases. He is Commander In Chief in name only.

(03-06-2011, 05:51 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: And wheres Bin Laden?, oh we don't care about catching him anymore do we?, not important, I mean he was only the mastermind behind the biggest terrorist attack in history, no big deal, lets prioritise.

Oh, I think the current administration cares very much but it's become an embarassment that we haven't found him. Barack would probably give his left nut to have that happen before the next election.

"McChrystal made a huge mistake here.

Here is what one of McCrystal's aides said about Obama, "Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was," the aide said. "Here's the guy who's going to run his f****** war, but he didn't seem very engaged. The boss (McCrystal) was pretty disappointed."

In the article, McChrystal said the president criticized him for speaking too bluntly about needing more troops last fall.

"I found that time painful," McChrystal said in the article. "I was selling an unsellable position."
He also said: "Obama is no Commander-in-Chief." "

(03-06-2011, 06:30 PM)Cracker Wrote: Didn't read it. You are a foreigner. Cracker disqualifies you from any further discussion of American issues.

There are British troops in Afghanistan so it isn't just an American issue, and even if it was just an American issue my opinion is just as vaild as anyone elses on the WORLD WIDE web bitchflake.

You won't try and disprove what I say anymore because in this thread I have shot you down in flames every single time and you know it.

Your "you're a foreigner what do you know" schtick is typical of right wing wingnuts when they realise they have been dealt a knockout blow.

Managed to find any evidence of WMD's or "middle easterners" in the US with chemical weapons?

(03-06-2011, 06:58 PM)Cracker Wrote: No. He only golfs on military bases. He is Commander In Chief in name only.

Ah But it was Bush who said he "didn't know or care" where Osama Bin Laden was.

Great example of commander in chief skills there.

(03-07-2011, 12:42 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-06-2011, 06:30 PM)Cracker Wrote: Didn't read it. You are a foreigner. Cracker disqualifies you from any further discussion of American issues.

Managed to find any evidence of WMD's or "middle easterners" in the US with chemical weapons?

Have you managed to find any evidence that there are no WMD's or no middle easterners with chemical or biological weapons in the US?

Funny that you would assume that finding no evidence of a crime that hasn't been committed yet is evidence that a crime will not be committed.

Jesus you're a dumb fuck OP.


If a person could find evidence of a crime that was going to be committed but hasn't been committed yet it it could be prevented from happening , to bad you didn't use your talent and theory on how to not be attacked to stop the subway bombings in britain OP that would have saved lives and may be even made your stupid bullshit some what relevant.

interestingly enough, your country seems to have a poor track record at stopping that kind of shit from happening.

(03-07-2011, 12:52 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Have you managed to find any evidence that there are no WMD's or no middle easterners with chemical or biological weapons in the US?

Funny that you would assume that finding no evidence of a crime that hasn't been committed yet is evidence that a crime will not be committed.

Jesus you're a dumb fuck OP.


If a person could find evidence of a crime that was going to be committed but hasn't been committed yet it it could be prevented from happening , to bad you didn't use your talent and theory on how to not be attacked to stop the subway bombings in britain OP that would have saved lives and may be even made your stupid bullshit some what relevant.

interestingly enough, your country seems to have a poor track record at stopping that kind of shit from happening.

For fucks sake how many times do I have to explain that the burden of proof doesn't rest with me providing negative evidence but on you and all the other sheep who continue to buy the lies the GOP used to justify the invasion of Iraq?

Do you want me to explain it again rainman?, fucks sake, if you had a braincell it would die of loneliness.

"I can fly!"
"Prove it, go on then, fly!"
"No, prove I can't fly! hah!"

This is the basis of your bullshit strawman argument you goofy tossbag.

As for the UK's track record of preventing terrorist attacks I would say our government is equally as incompotent as the US government at ignoring intelligence relating to potential terrorist attacks.

I don't trust our government to protect me, why would I, because they tell me to? Pfft.

(03-07-2011, 01:02 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-07-2011, 12:52 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Have you managed to find any evidence that there are no WMD's or no middle easterners with chemical or biological weapons in the US?

Funny that you would assume that finding no evidence of a crime that hasn't been committed yet is evidence that a crime will not be committed.

Jesus you're a dumb fuck OP.


If a person could find evidence of a crime that was going to be committed but hasn't been committed yet it it could be prevented from happening , to bad you didn't use your talent and theory on how to not be attacked to stop the subway bombings in britain OP that would have saved lives and may be even made your stupid bullshit some what relevant.

interestingly enough, your country seems to have a poor track record at stopping that kind of shit from happening.

For fucks sake how many times do I have to explain that the burden of proof doesn't rest with me providing negative evidence but on you and all the other sheep who continue to buy the lies the GOP used to justify the invasion of Iraq?

Do you want me to explain it again rainman?, fucks sake, if you had a braincell it would die of loneliness.

"I can fly!"
"Prove it, go on then, fly!"
"No, prove I can't fly! hah!"

This is the basis of your bullshit strawman argument you goofy tossbag.

As for the UK's track record of preventing terrorist attacks I would say our government is equally as incompotent as the US government at ignoring intelligence relating to potential terrorist attacks.

Do you want evidence of the bombings and terrorist attacks that have been prevented ? some of them originating in your little country.

If you want us to stop looking for WMD's and Chemical / Biological weapons then give us the peace of mind and prove that there are none here.

again you are a stupid fuck OP.

There is just as much of a chance that they are here as there is that they are not.

take the ass I just handed you and shut the fuck up retard.

(03-07-2011, 01:05 PM)Duchess Wrote:

I don't trust our government to protect me, why would I, because they tell me to? Pfft.

Thats because you have common sense, unlike dick and vinegar tits who sleep soundly at night as long as there is a white Christian Republican in the whitehouse.

Hmmmmm "white Christian republican" I think I just heard dick come in his pants, he's gonna have a nap and suck his thumb now.

(03-07-2011, 01:10 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-07-2011, 01:05 PM)Duchess Wrote:

I don't trust our government to protect me, why would I, because they tell me to? Pfft.

Thats because you have common sense, unlike dick and vinegar tits who sleep soundly at night as long as there is a white Christian Republican in the whitehouse.

Hmmmmm "white Christian republican" I think I just heard dick come in his pants, he's gonna have a nap and suck his thumb now.

Holy fuck you are retarded.

We have been telling you that there is no security, you have been arguing the other side of this shit for three fucking days now.

(03-07-2011, 01:07 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Do you want evidence of the bombings and terrorist attacks that have been prevented ? some of them originating in your little country.

If you want us to stop looking for WMD's and Chemical / Biological weapons then give us the peace of mind and prove that there are none here.

again you are a stupid fuck OP.

There is just as much of a chance that they are here as there is that they are not.

take the ass I just handed you and shut the fuck up retard.

Sorry I must have missed the part where you handed me my ass, did anyone else spot that bit anywhere?, no I didn't think so. I have comprehensively been able to disprove everything you have said so far dick and you, me and everyone knows it.

Where the fuck did I say we should give up looking for chemical weapons and WMD's? can you find the bit where I said that and quote it please?, shall I save you time?, i never said that, putting words in peoples mouths is another tactic fuckwits like you use.

We should at least try and find something of note, there have been a lot of terrorist arrests in the UK but very few charges and sentences, pesky shit like complete and utter lack of evidence keeps getting in the way.

(03-07-2011, 01:20 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: I have comprehensively been able to disprove everything you have said so far dick and you, me and everyone knows it

It's been masterful, to say the least.

(03-07-2011, 01:22 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(03-07-2011, 01:20 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: I have comprehensively been able to disprove everything you have said so far dick and you, me and everyone knows it

It's been masterful, to say the least.

For my darling Duchess, we appreciate your talents.


[attachment=7960]

(03-07-2011, 02:48 PM)IMaDick Wrote: It's actually been the other way around, but hell short people need something.

You lost as soon as I asked for proof none existed in the US.

I'll prove that none existed in the US when you prove to me there are no magical pink pixie dragons living underground on the moon. You can't, its impossible.

In fact magical pink pixie dragons living on the moon is probably a more believable theory than WMD's in Iraq and mysterious arabs with suitcases full of plutonium wandering around Manhattan looking for a buyer "You vant green glowing boom boom juice?, I sell you cheap, very good price for you".



Have you got any other evidenceless theories you would like to share with us wingnut?

(03-07-2011, 02:48 PM)IMaDick Wrote: For my darling Duchess, we appreciate your talents.

Dipshit

(03-07-2011, 02:56 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-07-2011, 02:48 PM)IMaDick Wrote: It's actually been the other way around, but hell short people need something.

You lost as soon as I asked for proof none existed in the US.

I'll prove that none existed in the US when you prove to me there are no magical pink pixie dragons living underground on the moon. You can't, its impossible.

In fact magical pink pixie dragons living on the moon is probably a more believable theory than WMD's in Iraq and mysterious arabs with suitcases full of plutonium wandering around Manhattan looking for a buyer "You vant green glowing boom boom juice?, I sell you cheap, very good price for you".



Have you got any other evidenceless theories you would like to share with us wingnut?

On the other hand it can be proven that such a weapon exists and that terrorists would like to deliver one to the US.

Like I said you lost as soon as you admitted to not being able to prove that one does not already exist on US soil.

Now go back and kiss your own ass a little more in your smell of shit thread.

(03-07-2011, 03:49 PM)IMaDick Wrote: On the other hand it can be proven that such a weapon exists and that terrorists would like to deliver one to the US.

Like I said you lost as soon as you admitted to not being able to prove that one does not already exist on US soil.

Now go back and kiss your own ass a little more in your smell of shit thread.

I can prove that I know such a weapon doesn't exist because i can find no evidence of it, that IS my proof you numbnut.

In order to prove your theory that such a weapin exists YOU have to provide evidence for it. The onus for providing proof is now squarely on your shoulders dick, Which you will be doing....when exactly?

Please feel free to add your tuppence worth of trademark drivel to my victory thread.



I can't believe you used to be cop, did the police entrance exam consist of being able to spell your own name correctly?