(03-08-2011, 02:24 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I have no sympathy for these insurgent fucks who were taken prisoner after a battle where their goal was to kill Americans.

Neither do I, I would execute every insurgent found guilty of terrorist acts.

Who I do have sympathy for are the loads of innocent people who are basically kidnapped then locked up in Gitmo for years without any rights or the protection of the Geneva convention, only to be released with not even an apology.

OP, I tend to agree with you more often than I don't and it's not because I want to fuck you.

That didn't come out quite the same way as it sounded in my head.

(03-08-2011, 02:35 PM)Duchess Wrote:

OP, I tend to agree with you more often than I don't and it's not because I want to fuck you.

What can I say?, I don't like innocent people being treated like shit, whether they be Muslim, Christian or fucking Hari Krishna.

If that makes me a pussy then so be it.

It's nice to know I am more to you than a mere sex object.

(03-08-2011, 02:34 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-08-2011, 02:24 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I have no sympathy for these insurgent fucks who were taken prisoner after a battle where their goal was to kill Americans.

Neither do I, I would execute every insurgent found guilty of terrorist acts.

Who I do have sympathy for are the loads of innocent people who are basically kidnapped then locked up in Gitmo for years without any rights or the protection of the Geneva convention, only to be released with not even an apology.

I'm betting evvery one of those people had weapons when arrested, "we were fighting the insurgents just like you we were helping you" would be the quick answer.

Bullshit, have a gun on the battle field behind the lines we were being shot at from, you're and enemy.

(03-08-2011, 02:38 PM)Duchess Wrote:

That didn't come out quite the same way as it sounded in my head.

midget sexual fantasies, Nice Duchess !

(03-08-2011, 02:41 PM)IMaDick Wrote: midget sexual fantasies, Nice Duchess !

We prefer the term "little people".

(03-08-2011, 02:40 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I'm betting evvery one of those people had weapons when arrested.

You would lose that bet dick, loads of people who have been released without charge say they were just scooped up in their dozens in random raids.

One British Muslim was shocked when one of his interrogators accused him of being a member of the KKK, bizarre when you consider the Muslim in question was black.

(03-08-2011, 02:51 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-08-2011, 02:40 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I'm betting evvery one of those people had weapons when arrested.

You would lose that bet dick, loads of people who have been released without charge say they were just scooped up in their dozens in random raids.

One British Muslim was shocked when one of his interrogators accused him of being a member of the KKK, bizarre when you consider the Muslim in question was black.

Shit Loads? how many people were at Gitmo? top number? 505 in 2005.

hardly a number that could be considered shit loads by any standard.

I think abu grabe is where most of those who were swept up ended up, gitmo was for those they knew were combatants,Insurgent muslims have no problem lyng to the infidels.

There are no guilty people in prison OP, that's just the nature of it.

Where's that bumpkin that was in here yesterday saying, torture everyone, guilty or innocent, torture them if it saves even one person. I think this thread gives him a boner.

(03-08-2011, 03:13 PM)Duchess Wrote:

Where's that bumpkin that was in here yesterday saying, torture everyone, guilty or innocent, torture them if it saves even one person. I think this thread gives him a boner.

It was usernames turn to watch him.

(03-08-2011, 03:02 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Shit Loads?

Yep, dozens and dozens and dozens.

Heres a list of all the releases so far, if they were guilty of terrorist or insurgent acts why weren't they charged in the US?

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/f...ainees.htm

(03-08-2011, 03:13 PM)Duchess Wrote:

Where's that bumpkin that was in here yesterday saying, torture everyone, guilty or innocent, torture them if it saves even one person. I think this thread gives him a boner.

Using his twisted logic after the Oklahoma bomb all white people should have been locked up and tortured just in case you know? One white terrorist means all whites could be potential terrorists right?

(03-08-2011, 03:28 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-08-2011, 03:02 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Shit Loads?

Yep, dozens and dozens and dozens.

Heres a list of all the releases so far, if they were guilty of terrorist or insurgent acts why weren't they charged in the US?

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/f...ainees.htm

I personally don't want them chargd in the US, This is and always was a military issue they don't belong in our courts with our rights..

The military is doing the right thing by letting them go, they just should be putting them right back in the shit hole they arrested them from, so what if their brothers in arms kill them when they get back, who gives a fuck.

(03-08-2011, 04:08 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I personally don't want them chargd in the US, This is and always was a military issue they don't belong in our courts with our rights..

The military is doing the right thing by letting them go, they just should be putting them right back in the shit hole they arrested them from, so what if their brothers in arms kill them when they get back, who gives a fuck.

So you are saying Gitmo is basically a complete waste of time, money and effort.

Obama agrees with you, thats why he's closing it down.

Hell no we don't want them here. They go back home! Now they hate us too & want us dead.

I didn't even read the past several posts yet, all I needed to see was Dick's.

That freakin' name.

Just read through all of your posts from the past 24 hours or so.

The one thing I'd like to work on today, is breaking up my rambling writing. I'm fairly happy with my spelling and punctuation, and now I just need to compose some better paragraphs. With that said:

Duchess, thanks for referring to me as a Bumpkin. That is a first. Perhaps if you met me in person, you'd come up with something else. Perhaps not.

Dick, you and I agree on a lot of things, I think.

OP and Username, listen I never said lock up EVERY Muslim and torture them. I said lock up and torture every Muslim 'extremist' that the US, UK or any other freedom loving country gets their hands on. Yes, I'd like my government to have proof that they are up to evil, no good deeds before torturing them. If they have that, I have no problem extracting information.

I was also called a fucking cunt and a racist here in this forum. Two more names I've never been called in my life. This is super fun. I'm back for more!

(03-08-2011, 05:41 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: Duchess, thanks for referring to me as a Bumpkin.

I'm sorry. That was mean.

(03-08-2011, 04:38 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-08-2011, 04:08 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I personally don't want them chargd in the US, This is and always was a military issue they don't belong in our courts with our rights..

The military is doing the right thing by letting them go, they just should be putting them right back in the shit hole they arrested them from, so what if their brothers in arms kill them when they get back, who gives a fuck.

So you are saying Gitmo is basically a complete waste of time, money and effort.

Obama agrees with you, thats why he's closing it down.

You better catch up on the news, obama is considering letting these fucks be tried in gitmo by the military.

You see the military was right start releaasing these people back out into the world, make sure then end up at resort vacation spots for the rich and famous and presto chango, back to trying these terroists based on the evidence the military has under military regs and badda bing, no more terroists.

Like I said you're living in the past my frecked faced little irish ass.

There is no way in hell you're scottish.

(03-08-2011, 06:31 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(03-08-2011, 05:41 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: Duchess, thanks for referring to me as a Bumpkin.

I'm sorry. That was mean.

Hey, I have no problem with you taking a shot at me. None at all, or I wouldn't come here and chat with you fine folks. I was just saying I don't exactly fit the stereotypical image of a 'bumpkin'. Maybe, 'good-looking, conceited asshole'. But not bumpkin.