(03-29-2011, 03:04 PM)rothschild Wrote: I don't pretend to "know" what happened. Do you?

I don't recall asking what you "know", I asked what your thoughts are.

One of the difficulties with a 9-11 thread is that it takes a ton of time. There are organizations who have been researching and documenting that event for 10 years now. Architects & Engineers for 9-11 Truth, Pilots for 9-11 Truth, Firefighters for 9-11 Truth, 9-11 Bloggers and a shitload of smart and tenacious people who have uploaded millions of pages. IOW, people who have devoted themselves, full time, for years, combing through mountains of information. I've been on so many 9-11 threads I couldn't even count and they comprise thousand of pages of discussion. Generally, those threads take place on political and conspiracy boards, where all of the posters are contributing information because they know the official story is hogwash and they want the truth. In this case, it will probably be me cutting and pasting and OP spewing BBC propaganda. I'm not sure that anyone would really give a shit.

(03-29-2011, 03:05 PM)Duchess Wrote: I want to read their theory.[/i][/size]

Believe me by this time next week you will regret saying that.

(03-29-2011, 03:02 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-29-2011, 02:49 PM)Duchess Wrote:

So...what do some people THINK happened. I normally keep moving right on by when I come across these types of conversations regarding 9/11. What exactly are a couple of you saying without saying. Spit it out.

Fundamentallist Muslim extremists hijacked airplanes and deliberately crashed them into buildings some of which collapsed as a result.

Erm.....that's it.

The most idiotic conspiracy theory EVAH.

(03-29-2011, 03:05 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-29-2011, 02:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: It's not a "conspiracy theory" that NIST can't provide a scientifically credible explanation for the collapse of WTC 7. It's a fact.

Three things brought down building seven, structural damage, fire and gravity.

What do you think caused it to collapse? controlled demolition?, it takes weeks to set up demolition charges to bring down a building the size of WTC 7.

The explanation NIST provided for it's conclusion re the collapse of WTC 7 has been proven to be scientifically fraudulent and NIST has thus far failed to modify it's conclusion or provide a scientifically credible explanation for it.

Would it take weeks to set wireless charges?

(03-29-2011, 03:11 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-29-2011, 03:05 PM)Duchess Wrote: I want to read their theory.[/i][/size]

Believe me by this time next week you will regret saying that.

it would make the Johnny and Lisa thread look positively magical.

Why do you think people are being disingenuous about 9/11?

(03-29-2011, 03:15 PM)Duchess Wrote:

Why do you think people are being disingenuous about 9/11?

Can we just start this on a new thread?

Absolutely. You can be the author.

(03-29-2011, 03:10 PM)Duchess Wrote:

(03-29-2011, 03:04 PM)rothschild Wrote: I don't pretend to "know" what happened. Do you?

I don't recall asking what you "know", I asked what your thoughts are.

I know you didn't, but that's precisely what matters: do we or don't we know what happened?

Frankly, I don't give a rat's ass what anyone *thinks* about it at this point. Forensic investigations are about discovering facts and THEN forming an educated opinion as to what they indicate. Thus far there has been no forensic investigation.

(03-29-2011, 03:18 PM)Duchess Wrote:

Absolutely. You can be the author.

Okay.

*kicks self for doing this*

(03-29-2011, 03:12 PM)rothschild Wrote: The explanation NIST provided for it's conclusion re the collapse of WTC 7 has been proven to be scientifically fraudulent and NIST has thus far failed to modify it's conclusion or provide a scientifically credible explanation for it.

Would it take weeks to set wireless charges?

Compared to the twin towers WTC 7 looks like a small building but it was in fact huge, it would indeed take weeks to set up all the hundreds of charges it would take to bring the building down in the correct manner.

If it was controlled demolition it must have been done in secret in a building where thousands of people work everyday over a period of weeks.

Impossible.

(03-29-2011, 03:19 PM)shitstorm Wrote: Okay.

*kicks self for doing this*

I tend to start threads & abandon them. What makes me curious now may not an hour from now. I need to be highly engaged in order to stay interested.

(03-29-2011, 03:21 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: Compared to the twin towers WTC 7 looks like a small building but it was in fact huge, it would indeed take weeks to set up all the hundreds of charges it would take to bring the building down in the correct manner.

If it was controlled demolition it must have been done in secret in a building where thousands of people work everyday over a period of weeks.

Impossible.

This is where the anti-conspiracists show themselves to be just as fruit-loopy as the pro-conspiracists: both groups reach conclusions that aren't borne out by facts.

I guess a question on conspiracy theories concerning the world trade center would depend on which one of the several dozen do you want to know about?

And then don't forget the several dozen concerning the pentagon, and of course flight 93.

Here is a new one for you ,,those bulidings still exist but just not in this demension, the military finally perfected the philadelphia component and moved them forward in time 200 years..

(03-29-2011, 03:29 PM)rothschild Wrote: This is where the anti-conspiracists show themselves to be just as fruit-loopy as the pro-conspiracists: both groups reach conclusions that aren't borne out by facts.

So do you contend that a large demolition crew could have set up hundreds of charges in a large building over a period of weeks, and no one who worked in the building (including the numerous security guards) knew anything about it?

That if someone spotted them (which would have inevitably happened on numerous occassions) they wouldn't have challenged these strange men? "Who are you?, do you work here?, what are you doing?".

Where they demolition ninja's working in complete silence?

(03-29-2011, 03:39 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-29-2011, 03:29 PM)rothschild Wrote: This is where the anti-conspiracists show themselves to be just as fruit-loopy as the pro-conspiracists: both groups reach conclusions that aren't borne out by facts.

So do you contend that a large demolition crew could have set up hundreds of charges in a large building over a period of weeks, and no one who worked in the building (including the numerous security guards) knew anything about it?

That if someone spotted them (which would have inevitably happened on numerous occassions) they wouldn't have challenged these strange men? "Who are you?, do you work here?, what are you doing?".

Where they demolition ninja's working in complete silence?

YOU stated that setting charges would have been *impossible*, yet you're asking me to prove that it wasn't?

(03-29-2011, 03:39 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote:

(03-29-2011, 03:29 PM)rothschild Wrote: This is where the anti-conspiracists show themselves to be just as fruit-loopy as the pro-conspiracists: both groups reach conclusions that aren't borne out by facts.

So do you contend that a large demolition crew could have set up hundreds of charges in a large building over a period of weeks, and no one who worked in the building (including the numerous security guards) knew anything about it?

That if someone spotted them (which would have inevitably happened on numerous occassions) they wouldn't have challenged these strange men? "Who are you?, do you work here?, what are you doing?".

Where they demolition ninja's working in complete silence?

OP, come on dude, they had already replaced all of the security guards with agents.

They rented all of the middle floors and conducted remodels and installed explosive carpets and tiles.

all of the handrails on the inside stairs were replaced with solid explosives and they removed 36.2 % of all the supporting structure, they took it all out in their lunch boxes it took more than 6 years for all of this to take place.



The airplanes were nothing but holograms and all the people who boarded the real planes are being held captive in a secret location at gitmo.

The whole thing was set in motion by GB senior so that GB jr, could start it all by reading a kids book in a school, which was actually a secret code book with secret code words that set it all off.

⁹⁄₁₁ was just code for 911 since they knew that someone would call that number when they saw the hologram hit the building. the first call to 911 after the hologram hit the building set off all of the explosives.

Extrapolation into absurdity = logical fallacy = fail

I remember what airport security was like before ⁹⁄₁₁ ....it was shody. I wish airports in the U.S. were allowed to profile passengers like Israel does. They can spot trouble from 500 ft away. Why put grannies going to Vegas through all that shit? Especially when the entire group knows each other.