Not a bitch, just a question, Ily.

Why do you speak for Donovan and RG? Seems like y'all speak for each other a bit based on the posts I've read. I don't see other members here speaking for each other, friends or foes, so it's interesting to me. Curious, not picking...

(04-27-2012, 04:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Not a bitch, just a question, Ily.

Why do you speak for Donovan and RG? Seems like y'all speak for each other a bit based on the posts I've read. I don't see other members here speaking for each other, friends or foes, so it's interesting to me. Curious, not picking...

It's called 'I need a Wingman' syndrome.

(04-27-2012, 04:20 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote:

(04-27-2012, 04:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Not a bitch, just a question, Ily.

Why do you speak for Donovan and RG? Seems like y'all speak for each other a bit based on the posts I've read. I don't see other members here speaking for each other, friends or foes, so it's interesting to me. Curious, not picking...

It's called 'I need a Wingman' syndrome.

It's called an inability to NOT address posts that aren't directed at you.



But since you went there, I don't see it excessively with Ily. She and Donovan were engaging with Dick at the same time so...

Besides she's MY wingman! Mine I tell you!

(04-27-2012, 03:09 PM)IMaDick Wrote:

(04-27-2012, 02:59 PM)Ilyanna Wrote: Hellooo, he's a teacher. He can't help it, he always has to try and help kids get an education. Even hopeless cases.

I just gave him a lesson.

It was the I don't give a fuck what he thinks lesson.

You might want to take notes also.

Took quite a few posts to do it, too. It's helpful when one tries to be a grammar nazi to first know what THE fuck one is talking about. To get schooled like a punk and then pretend you never really cared at all is just embarrassing.

(04-27-2012, 04:11 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Not a bitch, just a question, Ily.

Why do you speak for Donovan and RG? Seems like y'all speak for each other a bit based on the posts I've read. I don't see other members here speaking for each other, friends or foes, so it's interesting to me. Curious, not picking...

Gear got banned for abbreviating Just Another Cock Knocker, remember? Guy tries to save a little time and gets smacked for it...some people have no sense of humor.

(04-27-2012, 02:33 PM)IMaDick Wrote:

(04-27-2012, 02:15 PM)Donovan Wrote:

(04-27-2012, 01:38 PM)IMaDick Wrote:

(04-27-2012, 01:20 PM)Donovan Wrote: I get the strengthening sense that in the grand list of "shit that is very wrong with the poster called ImaDick" grammar doesn't even crack the top twenty.

You fucked up from the start by claiming that you have any sense.

I will lend you one of my "the's" though so you have one for the next sentence you try to post, I fucking hate when people leave out words because they don't have any.

There is no need for an extra "the" in that spot. Written statements don't require an article to clarify which top twenty list if there is only one being referenced. As a college-educated teacher/writer I would be expected to know that. As an idiot pretending he's smart on the internet, you can be forgiven for your shortcomings.

You don't have to explain yourself to me.

In your screen name, you misspelled "ImaDipshit". Just saying.

(04-27-2012, 04:54 PM)Donovan Wrote: Gear got banned for abbreviating Just Another Cock Knocker, remember? Guy tries to save a little time and gets smacked for it...some people have no sense of humor.

Yeah and I miss talking to him goddamnit. I never even got to finish my conversation with him. You bitches are a damn pain in my ass. Just STFU.

So talk to the boss and let him back in.

(04-27-2012, 05:00 PM)Donovan Wrote: So talk to the boss and let him back in.

Haha!

(04-27-2012, 05:00 PM)Donovan Wrote: So talk to the boss and let him back in.

No. The only chance you get with me is the one you're enjoying right now.

That's in general terms & doesn't apply directly to Donovan, it applies to everyone.

HotD, not sure if you mean 'speak for' as in 'speak in favor of', or as in 'speak in the name of'?

If it's the first, I can only see that I did it in the case of RG after he was banned. a) he is my friend, and b) I strongly dislike bans, so I spoke up.

If it's the latter, well, basically what username said, plus - I see this thread as kind of my only opportunity for now to interact with ppl without feeling like intruding a conversation of insiders, so I basically jump on every opportunity to do so. Besides, apart from the "he's a teacher" bit, I can't really see much of myself speaking for anybody else.

But I am interested that you perceive it differently - care to elaborate?

(04-27-2012, 04:46 PM)username Wrote: Besides she's MY wingman! Mine I tell you!

LOL, yep, totally am!

Didn't Cracker get banned once?




Am I testing the love here?

Duchess...

(04-27-2012, 05:07 PM)Ilyanna Wrote: HotD, not sure if you mean 'speak for' as in 'speak in favor of', or as in 'speak in the name of'?

If it's the first, I can only see that I did it in the case of RG after he was banned. a) he is my friend, and b) I strongly dislike bans, so I spoke up.

If it's the latter, well, basically what username said, plus - I see this thread as kind of my only opportunity for now to interact with ppl without feeling like intruding a conversation of insiders, so I basically jump on every opportunity to do so. Besides, apart from the "he's a teacher" bit, I can't really see much of myself speaking for anybody else.

But I am interested that you perceive it differently - care to elaborate?

(04-27-2012, 04:46 PM)username Wrote: Besides she's MY wingman! Mine I tell you!

LOL, yep, totally am!

Thanks for your reply. Fair enough. I don't have an opinion about it or a problem with it, just an observation about a different dynamic than I usually see here. As this is your intro thread, it was the right place and opportunity to inquire.

Edit/Add (to responses upthread): Regarding bans, I don't initiate them, but I respect whatever Duchess decides and leave it at that. She usually gives warnings in advance and they rarely happen.

Yes & I personally invited her back almost 2 yrs. ago now.

Sumbitch!

If you all run into EH & Smegma you can blame them for my firm stance on not reinstating someone's membership.

(04-27-2012, 05:15 PM)Duchess Wrote:

Sumbitch!

Those two go perfectly together.

^lol, yep

(04-27-2012, 05:14 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: ...just an observation about a different dynamic than I usually see here. As this is your intro thread, it was the right place and opportunity to inquire.

Inquire anytime you like
I, too, think that the differences of board dynamics are interesting. They are one reason why successfully entering a new community, usually requires some lurking, getting "the feel" of the board. If it's only one newcomer, the differences probably don't even come into play, but in cases where, like now, a bunch of people kind of travel from one mb to the other, they become apparent. Much like in real life, actually - looks like there are social structures we can't (or don't want to) shake off.