(12-31-2018, 06:01 AM)Duchess Wrote:

(12-31-2018, 03:34 AM)Fry Guy Wrote: Duchess said she would presume the reason.

Oh Jesus Christ. DuchessDuchessDuchess. It was a wise crack, Fry Guy, nothing more, nothing less. I said it because of your know it all obnoxious behavior. I could see every woman you encounter running for the hills rather than spend a moment in your company because you are just too fuckin' much. I didn't even know you had a psychopath wife until you told all of us. How about you take a chill pill...or maybe a half dozen.

Not so wise of a wisecrack as it happens perhaps. Obnoxious? Perhaps more than a little. Interesting you accuse the same of me.

No its fine Duchess, you believe relationship status and relationships with ex-partners, partners and family are free game. Cool with me.

As to your "crack" about my marital status, you KNEW I was a single Dad and it was on this basis you thought to take a free swing. I am a single Dad so likely not a lady in the picture (people do not usually refer to themselves as single parents if remarried/involved with someone in a step-parent role). You also bases by being separated (divorced) based on the fact I had a daughter to whom I was a single parent (no I will not believe either you were unaware of her nor did not factor any of this in - even if you represent this) otherwise you would have gone the normal female male shaming of me being a living at home basement-dwelling virgin. No you chose based on the fact I obviously was in some kind of a relationship to have had at least one child (I have two incidentally, my eldest - same Mother - does not live at home anymore) and as a single Dad can't be with that woman. Therefore I am obviously at least separated (if not divorced - which I have been for 15 years or so)

THAT was your presumption. "He is separated and it therefore must be HIS fault. Relationships and such ought to be off the table BUT I will make an exception because he is a Trump supporter and annoys me". You thought you would get some mileage. Well done, you did. BUT you also opened up others including myself to look at other members and their relationships with other family members and such. How accurate was that presumption?

I would not have thought that wisecrack worthy (even to the obnoxious element here - yourself included) but you seem to have thought it worth it, so who am I to argue?

Oh dear God. *face palm*

You're reading way, waaaay too much into me making a wise crack to mock you. I was addressing your attitude, just your attitude. What the hell happened to you? You used to be a lot more fun.

He's lying, he's not in the Oval Office and he hasn't been.

...and the House is still controlled by republicans, they are the only one who can call people back for a vote.

What a cunt, it's New Year's Eve FFS.

(12-31-2018, 11:59 AM)Duchess Wrote: Oh dear God. *face palm*

You're reading way, waaaay too much into me making a wise crack to mock you. I was addressing your attitude, just your attitude. What the hell happened to you? You used to be a lot more fun.

My attitude is fine but yours has changed dramatic from the person we petitioned to be moderator. There was a reason we did.
I do not mind telling you that reason.
There were three types of people here at Mock back then:
There were some real degenerates. bottom of the shoe filth that were nasty, personal, vindictive, cruel and bitter.
There were some victims
There was you.
You somehow had none of the nastiness nor the victimhood. You were classy but tough. Your username suited you. It was obvious to us newbies the moment we walked in. We all knew you had it all over Sinister or any of her cadre of attackers to whom nothing was off limits and to whom any personalised, tailored insult or wisecrack was fair game (incidentally was the undoing of them).

You may be trying to represent this as an obnoxious wisecrack but as I say you knew enough context to make this a personalised insult the way Sinister and all did. You were always better than that. You have changed.

Me? I am still feeling this forum and the people out.
HOTD I got. The Snowflake mentality, Progressive talking points presented as news and fact, faux outrage and deliberate misreadings, presumption of moral authority, and want to pathologise people she disagrees with.
Clang I did not at first. I thought he was a complete and useless fuckwit. Now I understand he a bit weird but has a thick skin. I understand too that he is not putting it on too thick and he is mainly harmless and easily ignored
Love Child is weird but good fun to wind up and pretty harmless like Clang. Not dissimilar really.
Rootilda By her own accounting is the oldest one here, which makes her a geriatric by any measure. She is dishonest and easily frustrated and angered. She also is apt to post allude to masturbating and sexual fantasies here. Makes me think she is a old sexually frustrated woman, probably typing one handed at any posting
Blindgreed Seems pretty onto things and Pyropappy too
Maggot seems down to Earth
Sally whilst it is true she wears indifference as a virtue and I wonder if this is personality or something else....it is hard not to like her.

The rest? I dunno?

Always thought I had you placed a bit better. I am still feeling things out here.

The only one left is me you halfwit.

Who are you?

(12-31-2018, 09:41 PM)BigMark Wrote: The only one left is me you halfwit.

You made me read his stupid post and I'm very upset with you now. Funny he included me and not you since you've been here several years.

And TryTooHardGuy, I don't think many people besides you would consider 57 geriatric, but hey. I'll rub one out for you later, 'kay?

I hope you make a New Year's resolution to stop living in the past and get a god damn life FryGuy......then follow through on it.

You can't take a mock, you're a complete hypocrite and projectionist when it comes to dishing it out and not being able to take it (particularly with women), you're a gullible carnivore of disinformation, and you're a fucking broken-record snoozefest. 

We've had several high-maintenance drama kings before you, but they were at least interesting and/or clever.  

And, it's not worship of Trump that makes you obnoxious and repulsive; there are others here who feel the same about Trump and they're far from obnoxious and repulsive.  

I'd label you a 'snowflake' -- because that marker definitely fits you better than anyone else here.

However, it takes a lot more to melt a snowflake than it does to turn you into a puddle of mundane, self-absorbed, self-righteous obsession.

Nonetheless, I sincerely wish you a happy New Year and very much hope you get some counselling/therapy.

I've been on twitter too long, I was looking for a like button for this post.

What if he stops twitering or twitterousing ..........FUCK.......this year WWUDO? That stands for "What would you do"  I just made that up. 

America needs Trump, it's like WW2 when when failure was not an option and you donated your pots and pans to the war effort. Anyhwo that's the way we think of it.

(12-31-2018, 09:41 PM)BigMark Wrote: The only one left is me you halfwit.

Hey, he left out delightful Carsman! too.  ')

.....and Midwest spy and Aussie Friend and Six Shooter and Donovan and IamaWildflower

Big Mark was just wrong and did not think things true. Don't worry, you were there Snowflake. We have you all figured out.

I'm never worried about your bullshit Fry Guy. And, you definitely don't speak for or represent 'all', no matter how often you lamely claim to do so.

(12-31-2018, 10:15 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I hope you make a New Year's resolution to stop living in the past and get a god damn life FryGuy......then follow through on it.

You can't take a mock, you're a complete hypocrite and projectionist when it comes to dishing it out and not being able to take it (particularly with women), you're a gullible carnivore of disinformation, and you're a fucking broken-record snoozefest. 

We've had several high-maintenance drama kings before you, but they were at least interesting and/or clever.  

And, it's not worship of Trump that makes you obnoxious and repulsive; there are others here who feel the same about Trump and they're far from obnoxious and repulsive.  

I'd label you a 'snowflake' -- because that marker definitely fits you better than anyone else here.

However, it takes a lot more to melt a snowflake than it does to turn you into a puddle of mundane, self-absorbed, self-righteous obsession.

Nonetheless, I sincerely wish you a happy New Year and very much hope you get some counselling/therapy.

More pathologising. It is your go to. At least you are not trying to pretend you think me a rape apologist or support of Child molestation like you did Maggot. But you pathologise me all the same.

This is actually you all over. Part of that Progressive Snowflake aspect to you.

Of course for all your righteous indignant snark and faux intellectualising, its all bullshit, isn't it?

I am high maintenance? Okay what is needed to "maintain" me? No, no, you made the claim and it sounds severe, so let us know. I will start you off "Well...umm...you post on a online forum in which you and I are complete strangers with nothing tying us together except the connection such that it is with this place. You posting whatever you want to post means I can choose to read it or not read it and respond or not. This make you high maintenance because..."

No? You were just talking bullshit and trying to pathologise but wound up making fuck all sense?

As to living in the past? What the fuck do you think this actually means? Could really mean anything. Does it mean take no notice of anything written on this forum after acknowledging it the first time because then it is past? No, fuck that. Our impression of people, our experience and knowledge is all based on our interactions on the forum. Does it mean give people a pass on stupid or shitty behaviour because it is now in the past? No thanks. Does it mean in general terms not to learn from things in the past and what mounds you to become the functional human you are? That seems bad advice in the extreme. Does it mean not to focus on the past exclusively? I don't. Does it mean to concentrate on the future and present? I do that too, as do most people, and there is no indication online to the contrary. Whole lot of nothing there.

I am more than happy for anything thrown my way. But I will point out that it is not one way trading. Me expressing that or me firing missives back is not me not able to take it but rather me doing exactly that. You think I ought to simply take crap without response? Wrong person for that shit.

I think when it comes to disinformation you are really head of the queue. You report each propaganda piece with the unreliable mainstream press, and present it as fact and then expand on it as if it was incontestable truth. Then you call ME a conspiracy theorist for second guessing you.

You are obnoxious and repulsive to me too. That pathologising and strawmanning you do and that victim-pandering and the identity politicking is repulsive and obnoxious and that you do this with moral righteousness is pretty revolting. It is slimy and disingenuous.

"However, it takes a lot more to melt a snowflake than it does to turn you into a puddle of mundane, self-absorbed, self-righteous obsession." wow, this is deep. I find most of you mundane, you find me mundane and the big take away of that statement is....not a lot of anything apart perhaps from your self-absorbed, self-righteous projection of the values of yours seeming to be of some relevance.

So is that kind of it, Snowflake? No substance and an awful lot of bullshit and hypocrisy projected from yourself onto a strawman? I had a great year last year and look to have a better one in store this year. What the fuck are you saying about counselling and what for and why? No idea? More bullshit? Figures.

(12-31-2018, 11:32 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I'm never worried about your bullshit Fry Guy. And, you definitely don't speak for or represent 'all', no matter how often you lamely claim to do so.

Oh no I am being attacked by a pink-wigged small dog.

Wow, he's like a right wing donovan.

Donovan I have not seen much of but he strikes me as a strange unhinged man. I would like to see more of him. He looks like fun.

Naked I bet.