Check out 81 year old Martha Stewart. Go, Martha, go.

At least she isn't trans.

Money does have it advantages!  

S.I. is facing backlash for naming transgender Kim Petras as a cover model. 

What say you, should S. I. be lashed? Me, yes! 

I went looking for the backlash you referred to and after googling it I saw it was the New York Post who published it. "The publication is facing backlash from Conservatives, who are calling for a boycott of the magazine".

According to DW.com, "Kim Petras was already coming to terms with her identity by the age of two."

(05-16-2023, 08:29 PM)rothschild Wrote: According to DW.com, "Kim Petras was already coming to terms with her identity by the age of two."

Without a doubt, Petras was a child gender-savant.

"Her" absolute and resolute potty-training refusal . . . to stand to pee . . . was the lynchpin in establishing "true" gender identity confirmation.

It underscores the extreme urgency for gender affirmative healthcare!

And for "rock stars" deeply committed to pseudo-progressive advocacy.

(05-17-2023, 02:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: It underscores the extreme urgency for gender affirmative healthcare!

And for "rock stars" deeply committed to pseudo-progressive advocacy.

Just so you know . . . you've been vindicated regarding your statements addressing the "woo-woo" of the sexualization of children.

Any doubters to your position may consult the 2010 World Health Organization's report titled:  Standards For Sexuality in Europe   (68 pages)

Here's a couple of highlights:    " . . . a child is understood to be a sexual being from the beginning."  According to WHO, education begins at year zero (from birth).

By age 6, the WHO wants the education industry – and presumably their teachers – to expose children to the concepts of intercourse, masturbation, and pornography.   (I can only wonder . . . visual aids or "hands on" exposure?)

A "minor attracted" person's dream come true . . . if a child knows and understands, they can consent to sexual acts!  It's the Pedo Perfecta!

Take a victory lap.

Laugh, cry, or both, Tiki?

I'll defer to Alec Baldwin...




BTW, if he ever manages to shoot himself I'll be laughing and fist-pumping.

(05-17-2023, 06:45 PM)BlueTiki Wrote:

(05-17-2023, 02:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: It underscores the extreme urgency for gender affirmative healthcare!

And for "rock stars" deeply committed to pseudo-progressive advocacy.

Just so you know . . . you've been vindicated regarding your statements addressing the "woo-woo" of the sexualization of children.

Any doubters to your position may consult the 2010 World Health Organization's report titled:  Standards For Sexuality in Europe   (68 pages)

Here's a couple of highlights:    " . . . a child is understood to be a sexual being from the beginning."  According to WHO, education begins at year zero (from birth).

By age 6, the WHO wants the education industry – and presumably their teachers – to expose children to the concepts of intercourse, masturbation, and pornography.   (I can only wonder . . . visual aids or "hands on" exposure?)

A "minor attracted" person's dream come true . . . if a child knows and understands, they can consent to sexual acts!  It's the Pedo Perfecta!

Take a victory lap.

I looked that up out of curiosity. I thought their guidance on COVID was fucked up, but this really takes the cake.

(05-17-2023, 08:14 PM)sally Wrote:

(05-17-2023, 06:45 PM)BlueTiki Wrote: By age 6, the WHO wants the education industry – and presumably their teachers – to expose children to the concepts of intercourse, masturbation, and pornography.   (I can only wonder . . . visual aids or "hands on" exposure?)

A "minor attracted" person's dream come true . . . if a child knows and understands, they can consent to sexual acts!  It's the Pedo Perfecta!

Take a victory lap.

I looked that up out of curiosity. I thought their guidance on COVID was fucked up, but this really takes the cake.

Globalized grooming.

(05-16-2023, 06:48 PM)Duchess Wrote: I went looking for the backlash you referred to and after googling it I saw it was the New York Post who published it. "The publication is facing backlash from Conservatives, who are calling for a boycott of the magazine".

Because in the conservative world they are allowed to look at swimsuit models in magazines and lust after them, or I am sure as many of them would say, "Appreciate the beauty of God's creation"

We are programmed to lust, the way everything is such a hassle and full of drama the human race would cease to exist.

How the fuck does a Sports Illustrated thread get turned into globalized grooming?

(05-18-2023, 05:12 AM)Duchess Wrote: How the fuck does a Sports Illustrated thread get turned into globalized grooming?

Rainbows, unicorns, and Skittles.

Ahhh, well why didn't you just say you don't like SI being inclusive?

(05-18-2023, 09:20 AM)Duchess Wrote: Ahhh, well why didn't you just say you don't like SI being inclusive?

And who needs inclusivity more than pedophiles?

Who are the pedophiles?