(02-12-2010, 08:05 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:56 PM)Middle Finger Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:54 PM)Duchess Wrote:

So you've been reading for a year now, what pushed you to join today ?

I find it odd that you would leave MF off your list of notables given he created Mock.

AND it loves Lumpy AND it joins shortly after Lumpy got spanked for being a miserable rule-breaking asshole. Coincidence?

MF uses smileys instead of intellect. I don't dislike his persona, he just doesn't inspire me. He likes sexual innuendo and food and probably sports. He isn't any different than any other men I know.

Lumpy is funny. A little tragic, maybe, but she has a "voice". For all her faults, she adds something to this place. I admire her independent spirit even though her house probably smells of cat shit.

(02-12-2010, 08:07 PM)The Antagonist Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:03 PM)Middle Finger Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:00 PM)The Antagonist Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:56 PM)Middle Finger Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:54 PM)Duchess Wrote:

So you've been reading for a year now, what pushed you to join today ?

I find it odd that you would leave MF off your list of notables given he created Mock.

AND it loves Lumpy AND it joins shortly after Lumpy got spanked for being a miserable rule-breaking asshole. Coincidence?

STFU Control Freak. Duchess is quite capable of checking IP addresses to see if it's her incognito. Quit trying to influence the boss. Again.

Ahhhhahaha! Look at the Lumpy-defender having to say shit. Where did I say I care if it is her or that it can't be checked. Assuming bitch, STFU and stop telling me what to say like a control freak.

nice try at the Pee Wee Herman defense.

(02-12-2010, 07:58 PM)Julie Wrote: Militant? ::lol:: Have you ever met a militant Black person?

BTW - My hearing usually shuts of when some whiney ass pale face cries "reverse racism."

(02-12-2010, 08:18 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:58 PM)Julie Wrote: Militant? ::lol:: Have you ever met a militant Black person?

BTW - My hearing usually shuts of when some whiney ass pale face cries "reverse racism."

Yeah. I know some uppity women.

You hearing shuts off if anything isn't about you. Or if anyone else is right. Or if you have to donate more than a Benjamin. lol.

You are, again, correct. You aren't a reverse racist. You are just a racist. You think you are too good for the N word, but I'm sure you throw it around your hizzy to the lesser African blacks.

(02-12-2010, 08:19 PM)The Antagonist Wrote: I wasn't defending Lumpy you dolt. I was reminding you that Duchess has a brain and you're trying your damndest once again to try to influence her.

Nice try again at that poor deflection. Lumpy is quite capable of handling herself when she's not banned or stifled.

I'm sorry you have such a hard time with understanding the obviousness of my post - again. Your obsession with Lumpy is overpowering your ability to think clearly.

(02-12-2010, 08:13 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: Now this wordy fuck reminds me of an emailing forum fag that Lumpy uses in place of a real relationship. Only a Clancy-type voyeuristic loser who comments on sites he watches like a homo for a year would care enough to frown upon me in this way. Lumpy is generally good for a forum but she eventually pushes too far because she is emotionally dysfunctional and obsessive - traits I am sure your enabling ass is aware of - traits that her defending buddy Ant shares as well. Julie is just her recent focus to distract from her sea hag life. Now that I recognize you for what you are, I will be sure to chime in once in a while on your conversations for fun.

(02-12-2010, 08:20 PM)Julie Wrote: I'm audi.

Not gonna provide you with any more material for your sudden & suspicious quest to gain access to the forum.

(02-12-2010, 08:25 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:13 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: Now this wordy fuck reminds me of an emailing forum fag that Lumpy uses in place of a real relationship. Only a Clancy-type voyeuristic loser who comments on sites he watches like a homo for a year would care enough to frown upon me in this way. Lumpy is generally good for a forum but she eventually pushes too far because she is emotionally dysfunctional and obsessive - traits I am sure your enabling ass is aware of - traits that her defending buddy Ant shares as well. Julie is just her recent focus to distract from her sea hag life. Now that I recognize you for what you are, I will be sure to chime in once in a while on your conversations for fun.

I don't read here enough to understand all of your references, but I can see why you are suspicious. It probably hasn't occurred to you that others find you just so-so. It doesn't seem possible that someone would appreciate Lumpy's mind. You are so intertwined with her that you automatically assume I am part of a conspiracy against you.

I do think she probably has a mundane existence. I'm sure her house is unkempt and she probably wears a grey-streaked ponytail and old New Balance running shoes to work. I think she probably doesn't date much and fucks even less often. But, aside from that, she has a distinct presence and doesn't hide behind a nationality and a phallic symbol.

(02-12-2010, 08:11 PM)Julie Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:00 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:54 PM)Duchess Wrote:

So you've been reading for a year now, what pushed you to join today ?

I find it odd that you would leave MF off your list of notables given he created Mock.

I read the government's Internet use protocol today. I was wondering why she was waffling on using the personal information she gained from being an admin on her site, how she went on and on about the legality and then eased up when it because a moral issue.

Do you know what the word "waffling" means? Perhaps you are not as intelligent as I thought you were when I first read your posts.

I was very firm on my stand about PII from the beginning. No mind-changing or middle ground picking involved.

You're damned right the convo lightened up when it became clear that there was loose bowel bullshit being slung.

The PII accusation was a serious one and 100% untrue. The other "moral" shit was simple whining. All of these fuckers use info they know about each other as material for their mocks. Fuck them if they think I am going to not follow suit. How the heck else am I supposed to fit in and be a good mocker? ::lol::

Quote: She knows she could be fired for what she does.

Which is what exactly?

Quote:The issue of bragging about wasting the money I work so hard for just kills me. I don't know exactly why it bothers me so, but I take it as a personal affront. I think because most people make squat so they get back more than they pay in taxes, but I have educated myself, at great expense, and I actually pay into that bitch's misuse. Truly irks me. I'm afraid to file my taxes and find out how much I owe, and she rubs it in my face how my money is being wasted.

Where did anyone "brag" about wasting government resources?

This is simply an outrageous lie. Remember Cracker - for the mock to be effective, it must be at least partially true.

(02-12-2010, 08:31 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: Nice positioning, but bullshit on your "don't read here enough." You've obviously read WAY too much if anything. Your joining here today is not coincidence. ::lol:: And if it is what you say it is, you are one fucking creepy voyeuristic drama fag - holy shit!

(02-12-2010, 08:39 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:31 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: Nice positioning, but bullshit on your "don't read here enough." You've obviously read WAY too much if anything. Your joining here today is not coincidence. ::lol:: And if it is what you say it is, you are one fucking creepy voyeuristic drama fag - holy shit!

It must suck to be the EX admin. I don't have to kiss your ass. I explained my reason for finally joining, but because it isn't about you it isn't a valid reason in your eyes.

Why am I creepy? I didn't say I wanted to lick her all over. I just think she's funny. Surely someone who does computer/Internet crap all day as a chosen profession isn't judging me for actually visiting his dysfunctional forum? Does that even make sense?

(02-12-2010, 08:35 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:11 PM)Julie Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:00 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 07:54 PM)Duchess Wrote:

So you've been reading for a year now, what pushed you to join today ?

I find it odd that you would leave MF off your list of notables given he created Mock.

I read the government's Internet use protocol today. I was wondering why she was waffling on using the personal information she gained from being an admin on her site, how she went on and on about the legality and then eased up when it because a moral issue.

Do you know what the word "waffling" means? Perhaps you are not as intelligent as I thought you were when I first read your posts.

I was very firm on my stand about PII from the beginning. No mind-changing or middle ground picking involved.

You're damned right the convo lightened up when it became clear that there was loose bowel bullshit being slung.

The PII accusation was a serious one and 100% untrue. The other "moral" shit was simple whining. All of these fuckers use info they know about each other as material for their mocks. Fuck them if they think I am going to not follow suit. How the heck else am I supposed to fit in and be a good mocker? ::lol::

Quote: She knows she could be fired for what she does.

Which is what exactly?

Quote:The issue of bragging about wasting the money I work so hard for just kills me. I don't know exactly why it bothers me so, but I take it as a personal affront. I think because most people make squat so they get back more than they pay in taxes, but I have educated myself, at great expense, and I actually pay into that bitch's misuse. Truly irks me. I'm afraid to file my taxes and find out how much I owe, and she rubs it in my face how my money is being wasted.

Where did anyone "brag" about wasting government resources?

This is simply an outrageous lie. Remember Cracker - for the mock to be effective, it must be at least partially true.

You don't defend yourself very well. I don't rely on the pieces of paper from universities to validate myself~the stupidest people I know I met in grad school.

It wasn't a lie. You can't always talk shit then claim lies are being told and expect everyone to fall for it. Your posts stand. Your arrogance stands. You probably weren't aware (must be a white thing) that most people are disgusted by the how much of our money is wasted by unconscientious public workers. Your sense of entitlement blurs your view. For being so smart, you make stupid mistakes.

(02-12-2010, 08:47 PM)Julie Wrote: Hopefully Douche checks IP's etc.

(02-12-2010, 08:47 PM)Julie Wrote: This isn't even related to what was said.

Either way - you're suspect. Showing up here the very moment Lumpy gets banned and saying how much you love her.

Hopefully Douche checks IP's etc.

(02-12-2010, 08:49 PM)Middle Finger Wrote: Watch out - that was almost a control freak suggestion like Ant made. Who cares about the IP? What if it is Lumpy? That's funny, if anything.

I say let this little excuse-making, voyeuristic bullshitter in. Lumpy needs all the help she can get and this is just another loser who wants to defend her sad ass. Plus, Julie, you can hold your own so well you need another person against you to help balance things - heh.

(02-12-2010, 08:49 PM)Middle Finger Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:47 PM)Julie Wrote: Hopefully Douche checks IP's etc.

Watch out - that was almost a control freak suggestion like Ant made. Who cares about the IP? What if it is Lumpy? That's funny, if anything.

I say let this little excuse-making, voyeuristic bullshitter in. Lumpy needs all the help she can get and this is just another loser who wants to defend her sad ass. Plus, Julie, you can hold your own so well you need another person against you to help balance things - heh.

(02-12-2010, 08:58 PM)Cracker Wrote:

(02-12-2010, 08:47 PM)Julie Wrote: This isn't even related to what was said.

Either way - you're suspect. Showing up here the very moment Lumpy gets banned and saying how much you love her.

Hopefully Douche checks IP's etc.

Yes, it did. I parsed your post, but just couldn't make myself read it all. I responded to what interested me.

Quote: You think you outwitted me. Think that. Makes no difference to me.