+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Discussions, Opinions & Debate (https://mockforums.net/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: Gay History? (/thread-5519.html)
Gay History? - username - 04-15-2011
Fucking California is set to become the first state to require the teaching of gay history.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110414/ap_on_re_us/us_gay_history_calif_schools
What's next, the history of obesity? Obese people are subject to being bullied, right?
A local article stated that California already requires schools to cover the contributions of: women, African-Americans, Mexican Americans, entrepreneurs (wtf?), Asian Americans, European Americans, American Indians and labor (promoting unions, are we??).
RE: Gay History? - ramseycat - 04-15-2011
Gay history??? Gay history. Hmm.
(didn't we used to have an eye roll smiley?)
RE: Gay History? - username - 04-15-2011
(04-15-2011, 03:19 PM)ramseycat Wrote: Gay history??? Gay history. Hmm.
(didn't we used to have an eye roll smiley?)
In the beginning, there were two men, one man giveth and the other receiveth...in the ass.
RE: Gay History? - thekid65 - 04-15-2011
Jesusfuckingchrist.....it's no wonder the Asians and Indians are kicking the USA's asses in the education of our youth.
RE: Gay History? - Duchess - 04-15-2011
Why?
RE: Gay History? - username - 04-15-2011
(04-15-2011, 03:54 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Why?
Because some faggot senator introduced the legislation.
RE: Gay History? - shitstorm - 04-15-2011
That's commie lefties for ya.
RE: Gay History? - Maggot - 04-15-2011
Private school looks better every day.
How can a State with some of the best natural resources turn into such a mess?
Some featherhead will be along soon saying "Whats wrong with that!"
RE: Gay History? - shitstorm - 04-15-2011
(04-15-2011, 08:41 PM)Maggot Wrote: Private school looks better every day.
How can a State with some of the best natural resources turn into such a mess?
Some featherhead will be along soon saying "Whats wrong with that!"
How can it happen? Who controls Sacramento? That's how California has turned into a shithole.
RE: Gay History? - username - 04-15-2011
(04-15-2011, 09:02 PM)shitstorm Wrote: How can it happen? Who controls Sacramento? That's how California has turned into a shithole.
California is a quivering mass of political correctness and an example of what can happen when the liberal agenda goes too far.
It is a shithole.
RE: Gay History? - Cracker - 04-15-2011
So, do they "out" people as part of the curriculum?
I don't see how you can possibly bitch. You live in Harvey Milk land.
RE: Gay History? - username - 04-15-2011
(04-15-2011, 09:56 PM)Cracker Wrote: So, do they "out" people as part of the curriculum?
I don't see how you can possibly bitch. You live in Harvey Milk land.
Accidental. You live across the street from white trash low-lifes. Does that mean you're that?
Harvey Milk is pretty much the only "hero" of gay history (I guess, I didn't even see the movie). I wouldn't want to be the one writing about gay history. How do you even fill up a page? I guess Rock Hudson could get a sentence...
A full page photo spread of Anderson Cooper might help.
RE: Gay History? - Cracker - 04-15-2011
I don't like any of the separatist histories. If you call it gay history, you are separating them from the herd and holding gays out as different. Same with black history.
I think if I live here long enough I might become assimilated. If I start talking about ghosts, coughing up a lung, running out of beer on Sunday, or chewing out my child's probation officer, please give me a heads up.
RE: Gay History? - username - 04-15-2011
(04-15-2011, 10:12 PM)Cracker Wrote: I don't like any of the separatist histories. If you call it gay history, you are separating them from the herd and holding gays out as different. Same with black history.
I agree. I think that separatist histories actually perpetuate stereotypes of a "lesser" group. Similarly, I'm opposed to affirmative action.
RE: Gay History? - ZEROSPHERES - 04-16-2011
I think it may be theraputic for young people struggling to accept their sexual orientation. I can see benefit in this.
RE: Gay History? - username - 04-16-2011
(04-16-2011, 12:46 AM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: I think it may be theraputic for young people struggling to accept their sexual orientation. I can see benefit in this.
I can see the benefit of having a special program for nerds or fat children too. Doesn't make it right.
RE: Gay History? - IMaDick - 04-16-2011
Stupid shit from stupid people, it's fitting.
why not just accept some people are born criminals and murderers?
I'm telling you ted bundy was a born killer, and so was jeffery dahmer, maybe society should just accept the serial killer, after all they are compulsive about the behavior, they are definitely born that way.
RE: Gay History? - Cracker - 04-16-2011
(04-16-2011, 12:46 AM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: I think it may be theraputic for young people struggling to accept their sexual orientation. I can see benefit in this.
I don't know how they can teach about gay anything without it being some form of sex ed. You have to define the term "gay" at some point. Black is self-explanatory.
RE: Gay History? - aussiefriend - 04-16-2011
yesterday on Oprah on the Womens channel, Dennis Leary quoted Arnold Schwarzengger saying "I believe gay marriage should be between a man and a woman"
RE: Gay History? - ZEROSPHERES - 04-16-2011
(04-16-2011, 02:18 AM)Cracker Wrote:I don't know how they would define it but my interpretation would be a sexual orientation towards your own gender, not by your choice. In fact the only choice the individual has is to accept it or fight it, but it's a reality that is undeniable. I don't know how you feel about it but I am sure sex ed would be a part of it. I disagree with others who have equated it with being born a criminal or murderer. That highly charges the issue and polorizes the discussion.(04-16-2011, 12:46 AM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: I think it may be theraputic for young people struggling to accept their sexual orientation. I can see benefit in this.
I don't know how they can teach about gay anything without it being some form of sex ed. You have to define the term "gay" at some point. Black is self-explanatory.